Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - The Hutter Prize Increased To 500,000€ and 1GB (hutter1.net)

Baldrson writes: First announced on Slashdot in 2006, AI professor Marcus Hutter has gone big with his challenge to the artificial intelligence community. A 500,000€ purse now backs The Hutter Prize for Lossless Compression of Human Knowledge. Contestants compete to compress Wikipedia to its essence. The 1 billion character excerpt of Wikipedia called "enwik9" is approximately the amount that a human can read in a lifetime.

Hutter's challenge is an advance over the Turing Test. Devised by the famous AI theorist, Alan Turing, a chat bot must be able to fool a human. It is pass-fail. Hutter's prize incrementally awards distillation of Wikipedia's storehouse of human knowledge to its essence. This judging criterion derives from a mathematical theory of natural science, informally known as "Occam's Razor". Formally it is called Algorithmic Information Theory or AIT. AIT is, according to Hutter's "AIXI" theory, essential to Universal Intelligence.

Hutter's judging criterion is superior to Turing's in 3 ways:

1) It is objective,
2) It rewards incremental improvements,
3) It is founded on a mathematical theory of natural science.

Detailed rules for the contest and answers to frequently asked questions are available.

Submission + - TIBET(tm) 5.0 Release, Intro Video, Docs and GitHub Repo (medium.com)

Baldrson writes: Scott Shattuck at Medium.com reports: "TIBET 5.0 is now available." A dream? To some. A NIGHTMARE TO OTHERS — particularly those counting on TIBET 5.0 to be the DukeNukem Forever of web application frameworks. See the introductory "Why TIBET?" tl;dr; video. Or the documentation and white papers for the literate. Or, the TIBET repo for the obsessive.

Comment Shortage of STEM Workers? (Score 1) 358

Many if not most of the responses here posit that the degree requirement, even if not directly related to the job, is a cheap, if crude, way to filter out a deluge of job applicants.

If there is such a shortage of STEM workers that it is necessary to import so many that Silicon Valley has become majority Asian in less than a generation, it is rather difficult to justify such crude measures.

In reality, what is going on is that capturing positive network externalities has increasingly been the VC business model -- not invention. This creates monopoly profits that insulates management from bad hiring decisions. Rather than letting those bad decisions go to waste, Asian cultures, which can smell economic rent 10,000 miles away, ramped up their diploma mills (a diploma being the equivalent of a taxi cab medallion in terms of rent seeking), targeted the network effect monopolies, targeted the hiring authority of those companies, imported their "degreed" coethnics in huge numbers under the H-1b program, and focused more and more of the VC world on the rent-seeking network effect business model. The "guest workers" are then on a green card track which, when obtained, raises their value in the dowry market by tens of thousands of dollars. Everyone wins, except Western civilization and the folks that built it.

Comment Universal algorithmic IQ test (Score 1) 384

“Sandra Wachter, a researcher in data ethics and algorithms at the University of Oxford, said: “The world is biased, the historical data is biased, hence it is not surprising that we receive biased results.””

The single most subversive thing that can be done in the present environment is to financially back lossless compression prizes. One such prize is the Hutter Prize for Lossless Compression of Human Knowledge — although it needs to be expanded to include all of Wikipedia. Perhaps a more immediate prize would be based on compressing a wide variety of social science data. Sandy can then show everyone how smart she is by modeling the “bias in the data” so as to better predict it — which is exactly why compression is _the_ unbiased universal algorithmic IQ test.

See: https://vimeo.com/17553536

Comment Who Will Protect the Internet Archive Itself? (Score 5, Interesting) 590

If you have a domain name under which you have a lot of content -- an example is kuro5hin.org -- and, after a decade or so you find yourself impoverished and stressed to the point that you can't renew the domain registration (as did Rusty Foster), a domain squatter jumps on it and holds it hostage for thousands of dollars. When that happens, frequently even "The Wayback Machine" is told to deep-six the archived content by the simple expedient of placing a robots.txt file in the home directory of the hijacked domain. "The Wayback Machine" then dutifully removes public access to the content. OH but the fun doesn't stop there! So now let's say you fork over the ransom money to the domain squatter, get the domain name back and remove the robots.txt. Of course "The Wayback Machine" then restores public access to all those articles... right?

WRONG!

archive.org does keep it stored and it is accessible to those with insider status, but no more public access EVER.

There really is value in hoarding history and if you can get away with it by doing it "on accident" all the better!

Submission + - SciAm Brains Fall Out Of "Open Mind" Toward Cold Fusion?

Baldrson writes: Close on the heels of Chemical and Engineering News' article "Cold fusion died 25 years ago, but the research lives on", Scientific American has published an article titled "Cold Fusion Lives: Experiments Create Energy When None Should Exist". Both of these articles prominently feature Brilliant Light Power's recent claims of reproducible, sustained, high-density power with 100x Coeffienct of Performance (COP). As Carl Sagan famously quoted James Oberg, "Keeping an open mind is a virtue but not so open that your brains fall out.." A quarter century ago the American Physical Society concluded, to a round of applause and laughter, that "cold fusion" was "incompetence and delusion". A year ago Idea Futures judged Cold Fusion false. Has Scientific American's brains fallen out of their "open mind"?

Comment Suspicious Treatment of Domain Drop Catching (Score 2) 42

Archive.org plays it dumb when archived content becomes unavailable due to a domain drop catcher placing a robots.txt archiving exclusion on the domain.

This would not be quite so suspicious if it were not for the fact that when the original author of the material "memory holed" by archive.org pays the extortion to the domain drop catcher, archive.org and requests that archive.org restore the content for the public, archive.org will frequently (always?) fail to do sodo so.

Archive.org's motive?

What is Google's motive for making its Usenet archives virtually unusable?

He who controls the past...

Comment Off-shore Off-shore Off-shore (Score 1) 248

Those who claim the US benefits by draining the best and the brightest from around the world are doing two things wrong:

1) They bad liars. Everyone knows they just want cheap labor. Just cut the noise already and accept the fact that they may have to send some mangers overseas.
2) Even if they happen to get someone particularly gifted to leave their native land and work cheap in the US, they're ignoring the negative impact this has on those -- usually developing -- economies which need their best and brightest in order to grow their economies to become importers of US goods and services.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...