Comment Re:One word... (Score 1) 543
Per the other reply that you got they actually did.
What they didn't use was nerve gas, chiefly out of fear of the allies reciprocating:
Per the other reply that you got they actually did.
What they didn't use was nerve gas, chiefly out of fear of the allies reciprocating:
Finally.
Seriously... Biggest crowd ever on day one? "It's not a travel ban" when Trump was calling it just that on Twitter? “Not even Hitler” employed the use of chemical weapons? Has there ever been a US press secretary so ill informed and/or prone to lying?
Have you been living under a rock? They have been doing so ever since LICRA vs Yahoo.
Possibly because, often being poorer, their typical diet doesn't match the diet of a typical white.
They could have asked Japan (or Korea, or China) to learn about documented death by overwork:
You seem to be implying that the transaction data isn't routinely sold to 3rd parties. Can you sincerely say that with a straight face?
"If you were teaching PR 101 this guy has just done everything possible wrong. He has insulted clients, he has insulted investors, he has insulted employees and he has insulted the media.
They might, but someone at Apple might also be thinking "no, they're actually full of shit and haven't found critical issues yet" until a zero day rears its ugly head. It's not like Apple could buy the stuff at an auction or something - or could they?
You need to enrich the stuff for it to be useful in a reactor (or for that matter, a weapon). You can't just shove the result back into the ground and expect it to be as benign as the naturally occurring stuff. Not to mention Plutonium and other nuclear waste, which you don't want anywhere near a water supply.
The bigger issue isn't the possibility of and potential costs of nuclear incidents. Rather, it is nuclear waste management.
As a power source it's competitive if you only factor in power production and rudimentary waste management like we're doing now. But that completely falls apart if you consider the future costs of storing the nuclear waste over hundreds of thousands or millions of years.
And so, going by your logic, it's not that bad because it also occurs elsewhere? How is that not dismissiveness?
It shouldn't be occurring elsewhere either. SV currently has the media's focus. Hopefully they'll embrace better ethics and become an example for other industries to follow.
(Or maybe they'll just no longer accept to give female entrepreneurs money. What a sorry world if that's the end game.)
You could also heavily tax extreme revenue and extreme wealth, and then pay everyone a universal income so that would-be entrepreneurs can bootstrap their business without desperately needing a big wad of money.
The industrial cat food you find in stores is choke full of nutrients that are pointless for obligate carnivores. It's akin to feeding kids with cookies and candy bars on grounds that there's a bit of flour and nuts in them.
Not to mention the severe lack of water in the case of dry food. Cats get the bulk of their daily water intake through their food, and only partially compensate the lack of intake by drinking more if you give them dry food.
"If you think you're too small to make a difference, try sleeping with a mosquito."
That liability won't be worth squat for the people involved if they get killed.
"When the going gets tough, the tough get empirical." -- Jon Carroll
