Anonymous Coward? I swear I didn't check the box. What the hell is going on? I blame...someone else.

Scroll down to firefox-3.5. Stupidly, this package doesn't overwrite the firefox package, meaning that applications will still use 3.0 to open links. Even if you remove the firefox package, firefox-3.5 is still not used. Changing the webbrowser in preferred applications seems to work on some applications...

Anyway, in the end I just simlinked like so: ln -s /usr/bin/firefox-3.5 /usr/bin/firefox, and everything worked great.

Sure, but let's take that one step further, shall we. What do we compare current Linux distros to? Vista? I rest my case.

What, in the name of Zeus's butt-hole, does this have to do with hardware?

science, artificialselection, hardware, power, story
hardly, no, no, no, a bad one

O RLY?
Unlike, for example, the keys to my home. If I give those to complete strangers they are still quite useful. For picking my nose.

File-roller, completely up-to-date. But I've had similar experiences with other GTK+ applications. Shouldn't the widget behave the same for all applications?

The kde file picker has none of these problems.

Picking a directory is tedious and unintuitive. When I just click the OK button to pick the current directory, nothing happens. I have to click an empty space in the directory, to 'select it', first. When I use the crumbtrail to navigate to a parent directory, it automatically selects the child directory I just came from. When I click OK does it pick the current directory, or the selected directory? Who knows. When I open the file picker later it always opens in the parent directory of the previously picked one. Why in the parent?

There are many usability problems with the current file picker.

Well, GTK+ is due for an overhaul. Fix the damn file picker. Get rid of all that excessive padding, maybe by making it themeable. Some consistency in menuitem dimensions would be nice.

Also, either give Metacity some features, at least the bare essentials, or switch to another window manager. That non-optional minimize effect is cringe worthy.

That doesn't change the fact that I had no idea what BT was, and I still didn't know after reading the summary. 'Telecom' should've been in there somewhere.

BT by itself and the only thing my puny brain comes up with is, of course, BitTorrent.

The data is decrypted at some point. Is it that hard to just capture the output from whatever device is doing the decrypting? We only need one person to rip it.

For one thing, there's a 64-bit build.

Chromium daily builds: "no native 64bit debs planed for now. The amd64 package is using ia32-libs.".

I guess they had to release a amd64 package to be compliant, so they just build a fake one.

"If you own the DVDs, rip them to a fileserver and stream them to your..."

Of course, you'll have to do this with your laser eye augmentation, since owning a dvd player is frowned upon around here. Also, the things in the 360/PS3/etc/ are not dvd players, they merely play dvds, we call them: spinning thingies.