Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Education

Submission + - School kids get virtual web lockers (computerworld.com)

Lucas123 writes: "These seventh and eighth graders in Tulsa, Oklahoma not only get tablet PCs at the beginning of the school year, but they are now issued 100MB of storage through a hosted school "Web Locker" system, according to Brian Fonseca at Computerworld. The Web lockers also include chat, calendaring, and collaboration capabilities, but school administrators can also monitor and track all files uploaded to the system, and lock out individuals for misuse."
Security

Submission + - Designing a PCI-Compliant Log Monitoring System (net-security.org)

An anonymous reader writes: Log monitoring activities are an integral part of Requirement 10 of the PCI Data Security Standard and it can be difficult to understand how the different logging portions of Requirement 10 interrelate. Despite this fact, some organizations are seeking to redesign their PCI logging environment in order to best accommodate the PCI requirements. This article examines a few key design points for architecting a log monitoring and management system that would be compliant with PCI Requirement 10.
Windows

Submission + - Vista Windows Genuine Advantage(WGA) is down (microsoft.com) 1

z3razerviper writes: "It appears that Vista's Windows Genuine Advantage seems to be down causing all sorts of problems for Vista users trying to download patches for their shiny OS. Oddly enough things get much less shiny when WGA disables Aero and other features once it decides your copy of Vista is invalid. Microsoft WGA Vista Forum: http://forums.microsoft.com/Genuine/"
Announcements

Submission + - Brian May Successfully Defends Thesis (msn.com)

DynaSoar writes: "Brian May http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_May, lead guitarist for Queen http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_(band) has successfully defended his astrophysics thesis at London's Imperial College http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20424659/. He still must resubmit his written thesis after making required corrections, but this is pro forma. He is to formally receive his doctorate in May 2008, nearly 40 years after turning from his studies to become a professional musician. The subject of his thesis, entitled "Radial Velocities in the Zodiacal Dust Cloud," is based on work he did in Tenerife in the 1960's. He has two prior scientific publications on this topic, in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (166, 429 — 448 (1974)), and in Nature (240, 401 — 402 (15 December 1972))."
United States

Submission + - Why No High-MPG Diesels For The U.S.?

gbulmash writes: "While looking for a high-MPG minivan, wagon, or SUV, I've been finding that the pickings in the U.S. are pretty slim, but that there are plenty of fuel-efficient diesel models in Europe that get even better mileage than some of the larger hybrids for sale in the U.S. With the U.S. having so many people driving so many miles, it seems ridiculous that even Ford is offering highly fuel efficient diesels in Europe that they don't/won't offer here. Is there an actual plausible reason why these models aren't being brought to American markets aside from "marketing objectives"?"
Space

Submission + - Crew ends 100 day long Mars simulation in Arctic (wired.com)

Paul server guy writes: "According to Wired Science http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2007/08/four-mo nth-mars.html and MSNBC "Cosmic Log" http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/20/ 325220.aspx the seven person F-XI LDM crew that has been stationed at the Mars Society's FMARS station has completed their unprecedented 100 day simulation. (it is actually 101 days, because for 37 they lived on "Mars time" adding 39 minutes to each day and losing a day to the rest of us.) According to the mission's remote science principal investigator Chris McKay, of NASA Ames. "Their pioneering simulation of crew operations on Mars time is by far the best work on this topic ever done. It sets the standard for future Mars mission simulations."
Crew Commander Melissa Battler, a Canadian geologist, commented in her blog that one of the biggest challenges of shifting to Martian time was not when to fall asleep (which they had no trouble with) but when to eat! "Several of us were hungry very frequently during our first 10 days of Mars Time, but our bodies seem to be adjusting now." Melissa adds that the extra 39 minutes does make a difference, "[you] feel like [you're] getting more work done."
Several "MarsEd" events took place where the crew would send a video presentation and then hold Q&A sessions with various Children's classes. For a major send off, as part of a MarsEd event the today the crew spoke to the NASA Ames Academy, and on the 22nd, the "Foxi" LDM Crew will be 'meeting' with Astronaut Clay Anderson, who is currently in orbit aboard ISS!
Following the mission, the crew will mothball the FMARS (Flashline Mars Arctic Research Station) hab and travel to the International Mars Society's annual conference in LA Aug 30 — Sept 2. This and more information can be found at http://www.marssociety.org/portal
My Summary? It was a fantastic mission, doing world class ground breaking science in extremely hostile conditions, and every one came through it in high spirits. A complete mission success. You should look at http://www.fmars2007.org/ to see all of the details."

Announcements

Submission + - Venezuelans Gain 30 Minutes

chirone writes: President Hugo Chavez has announced that Venezuela's official time will be put ahead by half an hour starting January 1. "Its about the metabolic effect, where the human brain is conditioned by sunlight," Chavez said in a rambling, seven hour discussion on his radio show "Alo, Presidente" with Science and Technology Minister Hector Navarro.
Republicans

Submission + - Al Gore and John Kerry Rode the Short Bus to Schoo (blogspot.com)

Advocate123 writes: There is a common misconception that the Democrat Party is the party of intelligence and reason. Al Gore and John Kerry have even been touted as brilliant and visionary. As usual, nothing could be further from this inconvenient truth.
Space

Submission + - Aerogel Hailed As New Wonder Material (timesonline.co.uk) 1

Twinbee writes: "The amazing properties of the space-age material aerogel have been known for some time, but only now is it beginning to be manufactured for widespread use. Highlights of the news article include resistance from a blowtorch at more than 1,300C, and how "6mm of aerogel was left almost unscathed by a direct dynamite blast". Perhaps the most obvious use for the 'super-sponge' like material is for insulation, whether we're talking about mountain boots, house insulation, or any winter wear.

Quote: "However, it has failed to convince the fashion world. Hugo Boss created a line of winter jackets out of the material but had to withdraw them after complaints that they were too hot.""

Movies

Submission + - Google Throws Lead Paint on Movie Download Market 6

An anonymous reader writes: As promised Google shut down its video store Wednesday — and its DRM made sure all movie files purchased from the store ceased to funtion. This has sparked a firestorm of negative commentary from the Digerati who see it as pure theft. Cory Doctorow called it "...a giant, flaming middle finger, sent by Google and the studios to the customers who were trusting (as in dumb) enough to buy DRM videos". John Dvorak called it "old bait-and-switch tactics" where vendors make promises, but build-in the ability to reneg on those promises if they choose to do so later. Both Dvorak and Doctorow call for the judicial system to step in, but MP3 Newswire says that the abuse to consumer trust will do more damage to the paid download market than anything the courts could inflict. "As a consumer, if you purchase a digital movie file online only to have it unexpectedly repossessed you will probably think twice before ever buying any such download again. If you do consider it again it certainly won't be for the same price as before. Experience made these downloads worth far less to you. So what are feature film downloads that can be revoked at any time worth in the market place? To some Google Video customers the value of a movie download dropped all the way down to zero."
The Almighty Buck

Submission + - Red Cross Strikes Back

Joe the Lesser writes: Following up on the story yesterday, the American Red Cross has issued a rebuttal to Johnson & Johnson regarding the use of the Red Cross logo in sales of preparedness kits. They state that not only did they use the symbol six years before Johnson & Johnson, but they brought up the 'Barton Agreement' which was actually never ratified and "J&J admitted this fact in testimony before Congress in 1942." Moreover, they have been selling preparedness kits with the logo concurrently with Johnson & Johnson products since 1903. The memo is below:

The following message is from Chuck Connor, Senior Vice President, Communication and Marketing:

As you all know, Johnson & Johnson filed a lawsuit on August 8, suing the American Red Cross and four of its licensing partners with respect to products sold in retail stores. The Red Cross intends to vigorously defend the suit. Following are the Red Cross rebuttals to J&J's claims. We have sent you messages and FAQs, and will be updating those in the future. Now we are sending you our essential legal arguments. We urge Red Cross units to use the following information in explaining our case to their communities.

As always, please direct any national media inquiries you receive to Carrie Martin at (202) 303-4459 or MartinC@usa.redcross.org. For additional details about the licensing program, contact Jennifer Niyangoda at (202) 303-4922 or NiyangodaJ@usa.redcross.org.

  THE FACTS AND LEGAL ISSUES IN J&J CASE

RED CROSS ESTABLISHED FIRST USE OF EMBLEM

1. J&J claims that it began using the Red Cross emblem before the American Red Cross. In fact, the Red Cross began using the red cross emblem in 1881, six years before Johnson & Johnson (J&J) began using the emblem in 1887.

2. J&J obtained a trademark registration in 1887, but did not object to the Red Cross use of the emblem at that time.

3. The Red Cross was first chartered by Congress in 1900, and that charter was amended in 1905. The 1905 amendment gave the Red Cross the use of the emblem, and specifically stated that "in carrying out its purposes under this [charter], [the Red Cross] may have the use, as an emblem and badge, a Greek red cross on a white ground..." The Charter grants the Red Cross "to conduct other activities consistent with" its Charter purposes.

4. In the 1905 Charter amendment, Congress intended the Red Cross to have the exclusive use of the emblem, and this was confirmed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) when they specifically reserved an application serial number for the Red Cross to register its Emblem in EVERY class of goods and services without limitation.

5. J&J was concerned that it would lose its right to use the emblem on its products, so it lobbied congress to allow it to continue, or "grandfather" its use of the red cross symbol. Congress thus passed a law making it a crime for third parties other than the Red Cross to use a red cross symbol but also permitted J&J and the dozens of other companies to continue to use the red cross emblem for only those products used by those companies as of that time. Congress made this a criminal statute specifically to protect the Red Cross from unauthorized users of the emblem.

BARTON AGREEMENT NEVER RATIFIED

6. In 1895, when Congress was first considering legislation to charter the Red Cross, J&J went to Clara Barton and negotiated an agreement (the "Barton Agreement") that would have permitted J&J to continue to use the red cross emblem if Congress gave the exclusive use of the emblem to the Red Cross in a charter.

7. The Barton Agreement was effective only if Congress passed a specific law that would have prohibited J&J from continuing to use a red cross symbol. Congress did not pass the law, so the agreement never took effect.

8. Thus, the Barton Agreement was effectively rendered null and void. J&J admitted this fact in testimony before Congress in 1942 in hearings in the House of Representatives on the "Protection of the Name and Emblem of the Red Cross." 77th Cong., 2d Sess. 279-81 (1942).

9. It is noteworthy that although J&J makes reference to the Barton Agreement in its lawsuit against the Red Cross, J&J did not quote the limiting language in the complaint, nor did it include a copy of the Barton Agreement with its other exhibits attached to the complaint nor did it even allege ANY breach of the agreement by the Red Cross.

DISPUTE OVER EMBLEM BASED ON PROFIT

10. The Red Cross has been selling first aid kits commercially in the United States since 1903. Until now, J&J has never challenged this activity. Thus, for over 100 years, J&J and the Red Cross enjoyed their concurrent right to use the red cross emblem in commerce.

11. In fact, over the past century, J&J and the Red Cross have joined in lawsuits against infringers of the right of the Red Cross and J&J to use jointly the red cross emblem.

12. In 2003, J&J began to complain to the Red Cross about licensing third parties to sell Red Cross first aid kits in retail stores. Red Cross and J&J had discussions related this issue, but these conversations never led to an agreement.

13. J&J then began telling retail stores that carried Red Cross products that there was "an existing trademark dispute" between J&J and the Red Cross.

14. During the past several years, on several occasions, J&J has tried to convince the Red Cross to limit its use of the red cross emblem on licensed products in retail stores. Only within the past three weeks has it become apparent to the Red Cross that J&J was possibly doing more than saber-rattling. Since that time, the Red Cross has been working carefully, analyzing its legal position and weighing options.

J&J'S CLAIMS IN LAWSUIT DISPUTED

15. J&J's first claim is for "Contractual and Equitable Estoppel." This claim does not mention any breach of any contract, and does not mention at all the Barton Agreement. It merely claims that the Red Cross made certain historical statements that it "would not enter into such commercial licenses" regarding the sale of certain Red Cross products that J&J relied upon to its detriment.

16. J&J's second claim is for "Violation of 18 U.S.C. 706." J&J alleges that the Red Cross and its licensing partners are somehow violating this statute. What J&J's lawsuit fails to recognize is that this criminal statute originally was passed by Congress as a shield to protect the Red Cross from other companies that infringed upon the right of ARC to use the red cross emblem. At no time has any federal agency, including the Department of Justice, ever claimed that the Red Cross was in violation of the use of its red cross emblem- that Congress gave to it more than 102 years ago! Now this criminal stature is being used by J&J as a sword against the Red Cross.

17. J&J's third and final claim is for a claim that does not even involve the Red Cross. It is for a separate issue against one of the Red Cross's licensees.

18. In its claims for relief, J&J asks the court to order the Red Cross from undertaking any "sale to the consuming public" of emergency preparedness and related products, even on the Internet and through Red Cross chapters and outlets. More amazing is the request that the court order the Red Cross to surrender to J&J all of these preparedness products "for destruction" by J&J.

19. To date, the Red Cross has generated about $2 million in funds for the organization from the sale of these products in retail stores. In contrast, J&J recently made $11 billion in profits in one year! This lawsuit is not about any threat to J&J's retail business.

20. In short, this lawsuit is a direct attack on the American Red Cross and its right to use the red cross emblem — a right that was given by Congress. Both the Red Cross and J&J have the legal right to use the emblem as they deem necessary to fulfill their respective missions, for the Red Cross to prepare the public for emergencies and disasters, and for J&J to make money in the marketplace. There is no merit to any of the legal claims asserted by J&J in this lawsuit. The Red Cross intends to vigorously defend the suit. We will not let J&J take the Red Cross out of the name American Red Cross.
Google

Submission + - Google Filters Torrents From Search Results (torrentfreak.com) 1

HiddenL writes: According to TorrentFreak.com:

Google has been filtering its search results for years. That's proven very useful for the Chinese government, and of course content owner representatives like the MPAA and RIAA. According to Google, the filtering of torrents from the search results is a response to the DMCA complaints they receive. The owner of SumoTorrent told TorrentFreak that he discovered that A search on Google for sumotorrent now triggers the following message at the bottom of the results page:

In response to a complaint we received under the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we have removed 1 result(s) from this page. If you wish, you may read the DMCA complaint that caused the removal(s) at ChillingEffects.org.
A search for other BitTorrent sites like Torrentspy and Torrentreactor comes up with the same message (note. the sites are still indexed but some results are removed).
Apparently "Do No Evil" includes mass filtering of legitimate content.

Slashdot Top Deals

Understanding is always the understanding of a smaller problem in relation to a bigger problem. -- P.D. Ouspensky

Working...