Had to change the subject line- the parent is correct, the right way to deal with this sort of thing is to *show your evidence* and take the lumps in criticism to your methodology one by one.
Galileo made the same mistake. When he didn't have enough evidence to prove his theories (because his circular orbits were actually wrong, we now know) he wrote a very insulting and imaginative dialogue explaining his ideas- while making certain church officials look stupid. In response he was tried before the Inquisition and, in one of those examples of the Inquisition being more merciful than the modern court system- was found guilty, sentenced to a lifetime house arrest in a 47 room villa with a fully equipped laboratory, with his only time out to keep going to Mass and attend church. And losing his ability to publish papers.
Somehow I don't think the current DC court is going to be so generous to either side.