No, the USPTO will *NOT* grant a patent for a perpetual motion machine. It will be flat out rejected for lack of credibility due to involving perpetual motion (which is impossible)...
Re-read the post you replied to: "The USPTO will grant you a patent on your perpetual motion invention if you submit a working model."
If you can submit a working model, then I think you've got credibility (and have apparently discovered an error in known physics).
Also, by definition, a rejection for lacking utility would be inappropriate if the perpetual motion machine does work.
the next logical step would be to prohibit cable franchise rights that allows municipalities to award monopolies.
That should have been done 20 years ago. Back in the 70s-90s, it made sense. Cable companies were given monopolies to incentivize them stringing cable all over the place so they could recoup their expenses. They have made back their money. Now, they're just milking the people.
LK
You can say whatever you want. You just can't do it on my property. It's really that simple.
How does the concept of "common carrier" even enter into the conversation? These are all things that are happening entirely within the private property of the platform owners.
Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?