Red or black, depending on where he set the ribbon.

What?

It's a gram and a half of sodium. It's 3.8 grams of salt.

When he was threatened with a lawsuit the problem magically went away. Obviously, he had the power to fix it. If it took threatening him to get him to fix it, then he deserved the threat.

Australian Ombudsmen kick arse. They have some pretty tough powers over whoever they are monitoring, and they aren't afraid to use it.

It wasn't budget cuts that got rid of woodshop and metalwork classes, it was the combination of legal liability and feminism.
- Little Jimmy cuts his finger on a chisel, mummy and daddy to sue the school.
- Woodwork and metalwork are mainly of interest to boys and are therefore sexist. They should learn "home economics" instead.

Waterbeds. Those buggers are heavy.

That's pretty much what Oz did when we converted. The open road limit was 60 mph, and went to 100 km/h (~ 62 mph). Same with the in-town limit of 35 mph which went to 60 km/h (~37 mph).
Made it much more acceptable to most drivers.

It is also perfectly fine for the prevention of "grab the cop's gun and shoot him" scenario. As long as bypassing the mechanism takes more than a few seconds, it would save lives.

They will if you turn the sensitivity up to "I need to search the hot chick" levels.

Some of them will. Not necessarily all. See http://www.fantastic-voyage.net//

Carbon dioxide does act as a greenhouse gas. However, at some point there is enough to essentially block that radiation window, and from that point extra carbon dioxide has very little direct effect on temperature*.

*It probably still has indirect effects by by affecting the biosphere.

Combine the two. Put your self-firing gun on the roof of your self-driving car, and send it off after your ex.

With a pain in all the diodes down its left side.

What I meant was, in the context of the law, you cannot challenge the reading on the device. Legally it is defined as absolutely correct.
Doesn't matter if you think you were doing 40 in a 60 zone. If the radar or laser says you were doing 61, then the law says the radar is correct. Arguments that the device was wrong are simply not allowed in court.

Your speedo is not considered a scientific instrument, and they don't care what it was reading.
It's your job to stay under the limit by enough that variation in speed doesn't take you over. They even run ad campaigns encouraging people to drive 5km/h under the limit.