Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Dastardly Customers! (Score 1) 260

So it's official. Everyone's a pirate, always on to lookout to pay less for more... So, in conclusion the real copyright problem (and licensing is a part of copyright) is the customer! Solution: Get rid of customers! Save Copyright! License as complicatedly as you like, never again worry about fine print or versions galore, be all you can be...

Comment Re:Deja Vu (Score 1) 625

There is also a Website about the procedure called "Gesetzlicher Jugnedmedienschutz" (Which very oughly translates in to "legal protection of minors from Media". The "Bundespruefstelle" (again very roughly translated: Federal Monitoring Authority) publishes the various lists with media which are deemed as containing youth endangering and/or criminal content. http://www.bundespruefstelle.de/bmfsfj/generator/bpjm/jugendmedienschutz.html (german only)

Comment Re:Deja Vu (Score 1) 625

Yep, both previous versions went on the "Index" -which basically allows personal posession, but not distribution in Germany. A court ordered all copies of Wolfenstein 3D in Germany to be confiscated in 1994 (german wikipedia: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfenstein_3D). Confiscation hit the PC and the later ATARI Jaguar Version as well. (Which, of course, made it one of the hottest game of the season) The Prequel "Spear of Destiny" got a "R" equivalent rating, but was not forbidden. Castle Wolfenstein (1981) was one of the first computer games on the "Index" and distribution was also forbidden in Germany. (German Wikipedia: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Wolfenstein. Again: personal posession, was not, hottest game of the season and a star of the early disk swapping networks around the Apple II. Aah, those good old Crackin' Days )

Submission + - Reviving old school recording

yogibaer writes: "Nature (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7262/full/461351a.html, subscription necessary) in its current issue has an interesting Q&A with engineer Duncan Miller from Sheffield, who is on a one man mission to revive the art of recording music on wax cylinders. He re-publishes old recordings but also produces new recordings with recording horns (you can find a picture of those and some historical background here: http://www.birthplaceofcountrymusic.org/node/37). In true geek style he reverse-engineered Edison's manufacturing process, using even court records, and modifying it to use modern materials and technologies to improve durability. (Website of his company: http://www.phonographcylinders.com/)"

Comment Anorexia as a role model is the problem... (Score 5, Insightful) 512

not Photoshop. As long as fashion models have to be under normal weight to be accepted for the top fashion shows and magazines, young girls will follow this role model and that is the real problem, not photoshopping bad skin. If you type "anorexic models" into any search engine you find a lot of gruesome stories about girls who literally starved themselves to death on the job. Alternatively: force yourself to watch "Fashion TV" for an hour. That's not a new problem ("Twiggy" turned 60 last week, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twiggy) and not one likely to be changed by any law.

Comment Re:Somehow the world is upside down... (Score 1) 371

As long as you accept this as "reality", it will be. Who says so? Where is the natural law that forces us to fight in some godforsaken desert, jungle or whatever when there is no enemy that can be defeated in open battle (or commando raids, or smart bombing some third world country) and when any reasonable objective has been the first casualty in the field. So maybe it sounds naive and "not-of-this-world" but if we do not start walking down this road, it will never happen. Free will and the ability to use it intelligently is maybe the only think that makes us special on this rock. "That's the way it always has been" is not an argument, it is the acceptance of defeat, it is the denial of the ability to change and lastly: free will itself. I would never deny that byproducts of military research are sometimes (many times) useful, beneficial, even groundbreaking. But just imagine for a moment that the same effort had been used on the byproduct and not on the actual product. BTW: I have a masters degree in history and not a bad one either, so I am well aware that our past record is a sad one. But nobody is past redemption :-).

Comment War vs. New Frontiers, or: What's wrong with us? (Score 5, Insightful) 371

I find it most astounding that once it comes to manned space missions governments start whining about the risk for life and limb of the volunteers and the enormous costs involved. Whereas the same governments have no problems whatsoever to put close to half a million citizens at risk in various wars around the globe (remind me please, what is the purpose of the Iraq War again?) The campaign in Iraq alone would have paid for missions to moon and mars and back again including a hot spa and an acre of green grass for the various habitats. Add to that all the money that is poured in smart weaponry and the next best way to blast a target from (or in) orbit and a sizable population could live on Mars before the century is over. Somehow the world is upside down and we have totally lost our bearings. Let the terrorists rot in the holes they dug for themselves and lets do something useful for a change. Heal the planet, feed the people, solve the energy problem and lets colonize our own back yard. That should keep us happily occupied for the next 200 years. OUR future is out there not that of bunch of tin cans with shiny wheels and solar panels.

Comment Re:Inmates and Organ Donation in the United States (Score 1) 309

Not quite true for lethal injection according to (e.g.): http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/28/international/asia/28LETH.html. Footnote: This aspect of lethal injection was even the basis for a plot of the televison series "Monk":"Mr. Monk goes to jail" http://www.usanetwork.com/series/monk/theshow/episodeguide/episodes/s2_goestojail/index.html. (I do not assume that the last quote is scientifc proof, just an intersting footnote).

Comment Inmates and Organ Donation in the United States (Score 2, Interesting) 309

The Indiana University Center for Bioethics has an interesting bibliography about inmates and organ donation in the United States (not harvesting) http://www.bioethics.iu.edu/body.cfm?id=79. Obviously inmates are - in some states at least - not even allowed to donate their organs and in some cases not even to close family. The ethical questions concering the death penalty aside: Harvesting without consent is IMHO not an ethical thing to do under any circumstances. Whatever guilt there was has been paid with the death penalty, after that, the will of the deceased should be respected. In doubt, consider silence as a "no". That inmates are prohibited to donate organs (donate as in: Not for profit and of their own free will) is equally nonsensical.

Slashdot Top Deals

Work without a vision is slavery, Vision without work is a pipe dream, But vision with work is the hope of the world.

Working...