Like most things this I'm guessing this comes down to money (not that that's always a bad thing).
In many market segments (think government, healthcare) data residency requirements are build into any contracts. Having a European data center likely allows them to big and win business in these markets.
How is this any different from the LifeStraw?
Having the filter in a piece of paper seems less practical and more prone to error i.e. water spilling over the side. You also require multiple containers. A dirty container from which to pour the water, and a clean container for storage.
Note: I am in no way affiliated with LifeStraw and have never used the product.
The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that law enforcement authorities need a probable-cause warrant from a judge to affix a GPS device to a vehicle and monitor its every move.
.
This brings up some interesting points: if you have a property interest in a domain, then what do you pay the yearly fee for?
Is it not similar for patents and/or trademarks? Don't you have to pay a fee to maintain your status?
I was just discussing this with a (Canadian) IP lawyer and his take on it was he would consider a domain (intangible) property similar to patents, trade-marks and copyrights.
Wal-Mart uncovered the breach in November 2006, after a fortuitous server crash led administrators to a password-cracking tool that had been surreptitiously installed on one of its servers. Wal-Mart’s initial probe traced the intrusion to a compromised VPN account, and from there to a computer in Minsk, Belarus.
Wal-mart has long since fixed the flaws that allowed the compromise, and confirmed that no customer data was lost in the hack.
Solutions are obvious if one only has the optical power to observe them over the horizon. -- K.A. Arsdall