Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: Look at how they treated the r/Canning mods. (Score 0) 72

Prior to this shit-show there is a symbiotic relationship in place. Reddit gave us the tools to create and have a community, and they got all of the revenue. It wasn’t a great deal, but it wasn’t entirely terrible either.

But I stopped giving them my free labour when we shut down. Indeed, even though we knew Reddit would have preferred we step down voluntarily we (my fellow mods and I) weren’t even going to do that much work for them. If they wanted it back, then they had to kick us out, and we would make sure everyone knew about it.

Even if in the end we were just gnats, we got out of a bad relationship in the manner that did Reddit the most damage we could inflict. Even with us gone, the community is still dead — Reddit moved it to Restricted so they could reap the ad impressions from all our historical content, but new posts are still not allowed.

We know we won in the end, even if it was just a small victory.

Yaz

Comment Look at how they treated the r/Canning mods. (Score 5, Informative) 72

Up until today, I was the top mod of r/Canning. Prior to the blackout, our users voted https://www.reddit.com/r/Canni...”>a whopping 88% in favour of shutting down the sub, with the majority of those voicing that it should be a long-term shutdown.

And so we followed the democratic choice of our members and closed down with everyone else. Not long after, https://www.reddit.com/r/ModCo...”>threatened that if we didn’t revert back to public, we’d be replaced. We continued to push back against their bullying, pointing out that the subreddit had not been abandoned (as we continued to respond to mod mail from users on a daily basis), and that we were doing was in line with our users wishes, and that if they wanted us to re-open, they had to restart negotiations with 3rd party app developers, give them reasonable API pricing, and give them a minimum of 6 months to adopt the new rules (they were given 30 days).

The late last week, Reddit threatened us again. https://www.reddit.com/r/ModCo...”>We were given 3 days to come up with a plan to re-open, and once again told them if they wanted us to reopen, they had to meet our demands, and that we wouldn’t cave to their bullying.

The r/Canning mods were all “canned” by Reddit today. The subreddit has been moved into Restricted mode (people can read, but nobody can post), and it has no moderators.

Great job with that mod outreach effort there, Reddit. We were whipped with the olive branch. They’re nothing but a bunch of hypocrites — fall in line and do free work for them on their terms, or you’re out on your ass.

Yaz

Comment Re: Good news and bad news (Score 1) 283

Did they misuse a usb B port for a host? It shouldn't be possible even with an adapter to connect a USB drive to a USB-B port successfully unless something in that stereo is cursed.

”Cursed” is likely the correct explanation. The best I can surmise (without having taken the whole dash apart) is that they just wired a USB mini-B in as if it were a USB-A port. I had to buy a USB mini-B to USB-A male-to-female adaptor to plug anything in, which makes whatever is plugged in stick way out of the dash.

As I said earlier, probably the worst use of USB-B ever.

In the early days of ownership I use an adaptor to plug a USB stick in, but it was enough of a PITA I stopped using it altogether. In the last number of years I’ve just had an external Bluetooth adaptor wired into the AUX port, and use that instead. I don’t think I’ve plugged anything into the USB (or used the CD drive) in a decade.

Yaz

Comment Re: Good news and bad news (Score 1) 283

You misunderstand. I don’t have a problem with USB-B when it is used for its correct purpose.

But in my car stereo is the absolute wrong purpose. The whole idea of having a USB port in a car stereo in the first place is so you can plug USB drives into it — and you can’t do that in my car because nobody makes USB thumbsticks with USB-B connectors. So I wind up needing an adaptor.

Likewise for plugging in a phone — if you wanted to plug-in a phone, you’d need a USB-B micro to USB-B mini cable. That’s not a normal nor common (nor technically to spec) cable. You can’t just take the cable your phone came with to plug it in — again, you wind up needing an adaptor.

USB-A/USB-B made sense when used as designed — but my car stereo (which came with my car FWIW, this isn’t an aftermarket stereo) is absolutely using the wrong connector type. Two seconds of thinking about it by whomever designed the stereo would have revealed why it’s a terrible design. And it’s why every other car stereo with USB input

has a female USB-A port instead of a female USB-B port. They designed it to plug USB sticks into, but you can’t because (AFAIK) nobody ever designed a USB thumb drive with a USB-B male connector (and why would they? What computer could you ever plug that into?).

(I’ll note here that the problem is technically moot these days, as I put an external Bluetooth receiver and plugged it into the AUX port so I can stream directly from my phone instead of using the weird USB-B port only my car stereo apparently came with).

Yaz

Comment Re:This isn't exactly new (Score 4, Interesting) 158

I’m one of the moderators or r/Canning — we polled our users, and an overwhelming majority (89%) responded they wanted to go private, with the bulk wanting it to be indefinitely.

But that doesn’t mean I haven’t been actively moderating — I get roughly 5 requests for access each day, which I personally respond to.

So I’ll be interested to see if Reddit tries to force us to be public again. Our community voted in favour of this blackout, and we haven’t abandoned moderating (even if the workload is extremely light). If they do so, it will be without the current moderation team in place — and as r/Canning strives to feature scientifically safe and validated canning techniques, they’re not going to be able to just drop-in random new mods and keep up the same high quality. Improper home canning can kill people, and proper moderation requires domain-specific knowledge and experience t keep things safe for everyone.

Yaz

Comment Re:Force the subs open (Score 1) 236

Good luck with that. As a mod of two participating subs (r/canning and r/ipv6), finding new mods is almost an effort in futility. Sure, lots of people want the power, but most don’t want the responsibility. Few people want the day-in, day-out drudgery of curating and building a vibrant community, dealing with abusive users, and dealing with near unending piles of spam and misinformation — and when they see what being a moderator actually entails, they usually disappear (and then complain when you remove their mod access).

Reddit has a https://www.reddit.com/r/reddi... ”>public Wiki page of “orphaned” subreddits that need a moderator — and the list is so big it’s split up into 16 sections. There are way already more openings than volunteersand you think after they show the community how they treat their moderators they’re going to have a line-up of new mod volunteers who will actually do the work?

Good luck with that.

Yaz

Comment Re:I must be the only one... (Score 1) 145

I pay for API usage for a number of services - IP lookups, traffic through Cloudflare, tax information lookups, etc - and any one of them would, at a fair market rate for the services, bankrupt me if I needed to do 50 BILLION API HITS a year.

I don’t think you’ll find a lot of disagreement that there are likely some areas where Reddit needs to charge for using APIs — tools that are scraping Reddit comments to create AI datasets for example.

But Reddit’s “product” is their user base and their content — and when they’re charging for API use for things that generate content for them, they’re effectively double-dipping. It’s like if your employer suddenly decided to start charging you for coming in to work.

In effect, Reddit already realizes a ton of value when the APIs are used to create content, as is the case with all of the third-party apps they will be forcing to shut down at the end of the month. It doesn’t cost Reddit to host their API when it’s used to create the content that brings users back daily. And that’s where the real problem lies.

Yaz

Comment Re:Cutting their own throat (Score 1) 239

What embarrassment? The question was asked “ What processor architecture competes with x86/AMD64 in general and not extremely low power applications?”, and by all metrics the M1 Pro/Ultra and the M2 Pro certainly qualify as a) competing with x86/AMD64, and b) not being for extremely low power applications.

You answering with some vague non-sequitor about processor architecture doesn’t embarrass me when that wasn’t a constraint on the original statement.

Yaz

Comment Re:Not a new piece of info (Score 1) 296

If there was a hard evidence, this would not be a recommendation, but a total ban.

This may come as a big surprise -- but the World Health Organization doesn't have the power to ban things.

The only power the WHO has is to make recommendations. That's it. It's up to governments to take these recommendations and either set appropriate rules, or ignore them.

Now that said, as the WHO recommendation suggests there are several very valid uses for artificial sweeteners that this recommendation does not cover. Artificial sweeteners are often used in various oral medications to make them tolerable, particularly for children medications. It's also used in toothpaste, where using sugar would be completely counter-productive (and where not using it would likely be problematic as people avoid brushing because of the terrible flavour of the paste). And the recommendation continues to recommend that diabetics who need to control their sugars continue to use artificial sweeteners in place of sugars.

So given those recommendations -- how (or why?) would you ban such sweeteners? The WHO actively recommends them for specific use cases.

Yaz

Comment Re:silly (Score 3, Informative) 44

Without negotiation, the standard requires that the device providing power only send 5VDC. This is done so that USB 1.x and 2.x devices which were not designed for this sort of negotiation can still work via a dongle.

We don’t know the specs of the power pack just yet — it may be that Apple will allow you to use it as a power bank for other devices as well, in which case the USB-PD negotiation will be required. Or they may decide to simply not provide power to devices requiring something other than some fixed voltage.

Regardless, if the power pack itself is charged through that same USB-C port, you’ll need to negotiate with whatever USB-C PD device you’re charging from to get powerjust like every other USB-C PD enabled device and charger on the market.

Yaz

Slashdot Top Deals

The Tao is like a glob pattern: used but never used up. It is like the extern void: filled with infinite possibilities.

Working...