Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:No link (Score 1) 962

What the hell is a "scientific worldview" ? I'm highly atheistic and absolutely reject CAGW. I have zero financial investment in this, apart from the massive increase in taxation I'll face if the idiot politicians try to tax carbon off the face of the earth.

Comment Re:Being 10 steps ahead of the market is bad. (Score 1) 459

If it's clever and fuel efficient enough, people will buy it.

It's called innovation, and it happens. Just look at wingtips - those went into most commercial planes almost overnight (relatively speaking, of course) despite the dramatic costs to retrofit, yet it was worth it for the significant fuel savings such a simple design change provided.

Comment Re:The global (computer) models of climate change (Score 1) 658

But it is unequivocal that we are poisoning the earth. Pollution is destroying our food and water supply. It is giving our children asthma. It's wiping out some species and mutating others.

Whoa! Hold on there cowboy. Them's fighting words. You went from some almost rational points to complete incomprehensible babbling without stopping to pick up a shred of evidence on the way. You even managed to slip in a "think of the children" plea. Were you trying for extra credit from other AGW lemmings ?

In one breath you say "no one knows what will happen" and then, without pausing to stop and think, say "our current liefstyle is not sustainable". Well which one is it ? Either you know our current lifestyle is not sustainable or you don't know anything about our current lifestyle.

Maybe some remedial classes in critical thinking are in order.

Comment Re:the answer is..... (Score 1) 344

"How, exactly, did the DNA get *onto* the swab in the first place?"

How about looking in the factory where they made the contaminated cotton swabs. And presumably the PCR method is so sensitive that it picks up the merest trace element.

So you're suggesting that this cotton swab factory employs only one and only one woman who packs every cotton swab on the assembly line ??!!

If not, why didn't the test pick up DNA from every other employee packing cotton swabs ? What is special about this one individual that has allowed her to contaminate every single cotton swab to be produced ?

Comment I call BS on this (Score 1) 543

What sort of hoops did this person supposedly go through to Google a site which charges for OpenOffice.org ??

Going to www.google.de and searching for "openoffice" goes straight to the official de.openoffice.org web-site. Similarly for 4 of the first 5 results are OpenOffice.org sites and the top 10 results all appear to be legitimate.

I wager it would be very difficult even for a n00b to get to a scam site accidentally therefore I call this story BS.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...