Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Did Free Software Opposition Contribute to the % Decline in Women Coders?

theodp writes: It's been widely-reported that something changed around 1984, causing the share of women in computer science to start falling at roughly the same moment when personal computers started showing up in U.S. homes in significant numbers. The conventional wisdom is that the marketing of early personal computers led to the idea that computers are for boys and created techie culture. But an anecdote in Lambert Meertens' interesting The Origins of Python suggests another possible culprit that may have also contributed to the decline — opposition to free software. Meertens discusses how copyright concerns at the Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI) helped thwart circa-1985 efforts to freely distribute ABC, a new programming language that was designed to teach the principles of computer programming to all as part of the standard high school curriculum (Python creator Guido van Rossum helped develop ABC while at CWI and credits ABC's influence on him).

"ABC did not become the success we had hoped for," Meertens writes. "When we started the project, we naively expected it was only a matter of time before learning the first principles of computer programming became part of the standard high-school curriculum, for which ABC would be the perfect fit. In some schools, teachers did offer experimental programming classes using ABC. But, when 'informatica' finally became part of the Dutch high-school curriculum at the end of the 1980s, it turned out to be nothing but a course in using a word-processor (WordPerfect) and a spreadsheet (Lotus 1-2-3), both products now only a faint memory. A serious obstacle we faced was finding a way to inform the remaining plausible target group of users—non-professional computer hobbyists—that the language existed. The Internet as we know it did not yet exist. Its precursor, ARPANET, was reserved for academic and military use. For whatever reason, the CWI directors did not approve the idea of placing an ad in Dr. Dobb’s Journal, then the leading journal for computer hobbyists. The only thing we could do was to mail copies of the software on floppy disks to the lucky few who had heard of our project and had contacted us, a few hundred people in total. In their wisdom and against our wishes, the directors of the institute had insisted that the startup screen displayed the message "Copyright (c) Stichting Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam, 1985," actively discouraging users from giving copies to their friends. This, by the way, was the same year in which Richard Stallman published the "GNU Manifesto" in Dr. Dobb’s Journal, which became a rallying call for the free software movement."

Four decades and billions of dollars in CS education spending later, educators, Big Tech, and nonprofits have rediscovered the importance of that mid-80's goal of having everyone learn some form of programming in school and are trying to make that happen, albeit in sometimes self-serving, punitive, tech sponsor-centric (despite limitations), and other dubious ways..

Submission + - Cheeky New Book Identifies 26 Lines of Code that Changed the World (thenewstack.io)

destinyland writes: A new book identifies "26 Lines of Code That Changed the World." But its cheeky title also incorporates a comment from Unix's source code — "You are Not Expected to Understand This". From a new interview with the book's editor:

With chapter titles like "Wear this code, go to jail" and "the code that launched a million cat videos," each chapter offers appreciations for programmers, gathering up stories about not just their famous lives but their sometimes infamous works. (In Chapter 10 — "The Accidental Felon" — journalist Katie Hafner reveals whatever happened to that Harvard undergraduate who inadvertently created one of the first malware programs in 1988...) The book quickly jumps from milestones like the Jacquard Loom and the invention of COBOL to bitcoin and our thought-provoking present, acknowledging both the code that guided the Apollo 11 moon landing and the code behind the 1962 videogame Spacewar. The Smithsonian Institution's director for their Study of Invention and Innovation writes in Chapter 4 that the game "symbolized a shift from computing being in the hands of priest-like technicians operating massive computers to enthusiasts programming and hacking, sometimes for the sheer joy of it."

I contributed chapter 9, about a 1975 comment in some Unix code that became "an accidental icon" commemorating a "momentary glow of humanity in a world of unforgiving logic." This chapter provided the book with its title. (And I'm also responsible for the book's index entry for "Linux, expletives in source code of".) In a preface, the book's editor describes the book's 29 different authors as "technologists, historians, journalists, academics, and sometimes the coders themselves," explaining "how code works — or how, sometimes, it doesn't work — owing in no small way to the people behind it."

"I've been really interested over the past several years to watch the power of the tech activists and tech labor movements," the editor says in this interview. "I think they've shown really immense power to affect change, and power to say, 'I'm not going to work on something that doesn't align with what I want for the future.' That's really something to admire.

"But of course, people are up against really big forces...."

Comment Re:30,573 false or misleading claims over 4 years (Score 1) 297

The claims database is interesting because -- at least in the examples on the first page -- Trump makes very general and arguably actually true statement. Then the Post analyzes it with paragraphs that actually back up the Trump's statement but some specific factoid might have made it false if taken out of context. The Post then says on other occasions Trump made a related claim that was false (but not on the occasion being cited in the analysis). Finally the Post concludes (without following any logic) that Trump's statement was false. Goes to show you I guess that journalists are not necessarily good at logic.

Comment Copyright violation minefield (Score 2) 61

Obviously the source code could be somewhat disassembled from the Bios. However if the source code has Copyright notices, and if Intel was enforcing their NDAs, this might be problematic from the standpoint of persons trying to compete with Intel -- if they cannot prove they didn't view the source code
What a benefit to Open Source projects creating OS bootstrap code, as well as authors of drivers compliant with Intel hardware!

Submission + - UK PM candidate says mistake to 'empower scientists' during Covid pandemic

Oxygen99 writes: The Guardian reports UK Prime Ministerial candidate and ex-chancellor Rishi Sunak was furious about school closures, and added trade-offs of lockdowns were not properly considered by experts. In an interview with the Spectator magazine to be published Saturday, the former chancellor said the response of the UK Government to the pandemic should not “have empowered the scientists in the way we did."

Comment Re:HP, comment? (Score 2) 31

I really like my XPS-13 3200x1800 resolution touchscreen. I know it sounds obvious but I just get a few inches closer to the screen and it works as well as larger monitor for seeing two or more high-resolution document and image editing. If I want more real estate I pop it into my D-6000 hub and power two 4K monitors (as well as the 13" monitor of course) My wife bought one after seeing how clear and readable mine is.

Comment Re:Seems to Confirm the Reviews Zuru may regret (Score 1) 142

Your post made me genuinely Laugh out Loud. What if truth *wasn't* a defense against defamation. Someone could become wealthy just by doing something egregiously immoral and then waiting for people to talk about it and then suing each one for "defamation".

Comment Kudos to glassdoor (Score 4, Insightful) 142

Reviews are just what they are -- must be taken at face value. Companies should work toward engendering goodwill from all persons with which they interact. We consumers of Internet content know that there are occasional sour grapes and take that into account. But one thing that must be protected is this: The well-meaning whistle-blower who is admirably trying to give accurate review.

Slashdot Top Deals

Our business in life is not to succeed but to continue to fail in high spirits. -- Robert Louis Stevenson

Working...