Comment Re:Struggle is growth (Score 1) 227
So as the employer, that's a pretty shitty deal.
I agree, 3 years may be the best from the employee standpoint, but a bad deal from the employer. I'd be reluctant to hire someone who I see is changing jobs every 3 years. And I think about how it looks on my resume if I am changing jobs too often - that won't keep me in a really shitty job, but it does affect my actions in other circumstances. 5 years is a better average. Employers can keep me for even longer, especially if I am still learning a lot on the job and/or the money is great and the work environment is enjoyable.