I believe most cinemas will refund your ticket if you leave within the first 15 minutes of the film. YMMV.

On the other hand, though, who do you think is attending a screening of a "special, extended version" of The Wrath of Khan? It's a safe play for the organizers to assume that it will be mostly die-hard fans, and "rewarding" them with a surprise showing of a brand-new Star Trek film is a very inexpensive and effective publicity stunt. (FWIW, I read about this first in the mainstream media.)

I'm as cynical as most about Star Trek and Hollywood. But this is pretty cool, especially the introduction by Leonard Nimoy.

Don't sugarcoat it, man.

I'm not completely convinced of that. Sure, they all refactor their own code, but at some point they come up against their ego about it, consciously or not. This is why testers should be different people than coders - the tester won't have any reason to hold back, and the software will be better for it.

Your sig:

"Please read and at least attempt to understand comment before replying, kthxbye."

Priceless.

Reading the story title, I thought this article was going to be about a colourful, wacky American named "Mississippi Bill." Drag that it isn't... :)

It's par for the course for them, IMO. The tone of the magazine is that of an ADHD fanboy with access to a very large marketing department.

Then again, maybe I shouldn't be too hard on Wired, as the ever-increasing irony of their name is amusing.

I can't believe the summary got "affect" vs. "effect" right, and "than" vs. "then" correct, but whiffed on "our" vs. "are." That's a new one for me.