Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Same shit different day (Score 4, Insightful) 95

You must be a noob around here. If you saw Microsoft's developer documentation in the '80s and '90s, you would think you have now died and gone to heaven. There wasn't Stack Overflow or Youtube videos to ask questions or show you how it's done. You had to figure it out on your own. Furthermore, it wasn't just that there were parts that were undocumented, parts that were documented had significant bugs in them.

Welcome to the world of software development.

Comment House of cards (Score 1) 47

WeWork's business model is built on a house of cards. They lease office space at a premium to startup companies. But just as soon as a startup company gets successful, it is going to want to expand to a larger office space and, at the same time, cut its leasing expenses. The companies that stay are the ones that fail to grow. They soon run out of money and go bankrupt. So your best customers leave and your other customers have high turn over rates.

Look at their balance sheet. Look at their financials. They have $20 billion in long term lease obligations. They are losing $1 billion a year. They just screwed their last round of investors out of half the money they invested.

A year ago I said that this is going to implode in spectacular way. I still stand by that statement.

Comment Re:Payload (Score 1) 191

You're explaining away issues using fancy science words. The reality is dead reckoning is incredibly bloody inaccurate at best with many working sensors and external input to help.

You are dead wrong. The correct science words you are looking for is called inertial navigation system (INS) and it is extremely accurate. How do you think submarines navigate around the world while they stay underwater for months at a time. They don't use external inputs or GPS. None of that works underwater anyway.

Comment Boeing loses $5 Billion (Score 1) 188

The fiasco with the 737 Max aircraft will cause Boeing to set aside $5 billion for loses. All of this in the name of saving a few bucks on software development costs.

That right, Boeing hired the cheapest programmers (read: outsourced) it could find to write the software for their newest model of the 737 line.
How much did they save, $1 million, $2 million, $10 million? Was it worth it?

Number of lives lost: 246.
Corporate reputation ruined.
$5 billion writeoff.
Newest aircraft 777X: delayed.

Was it worth it, Boeing? Was it?

Comment Re:hence why no matter.... (Score 0) 310

Nobody will take you seriously if you try to "push an agenda" while you're doing the complete opposite yourself.

Not true. If global warming is really an existential threat to all human life then any country that is increasing their carbon footprint is a threat.

If we pick a country, like China, and nuke the sh*t out of it, all other countries will see how serious we are about the agenda.

That is, only if it is an existential threat.

Comment Re:Everyone can be rich! (Score 1) 201

1. The metric was the same for the 1971 scenario and 2019 scenario. Both homes were assumed to be purchased with a 30-yr fixed mortgage where the borrower was loaned the full value of the home. Nothing was manipulated.

2. Metrics are "correct" if they give "useful" information, "incorrect" if they do not. The metric of price/income is useful only if people paid for their home in full at the time of purchase. Most people, in fact, finance their home so the metric of payment/income is more useful in that case.

Comment Re:Everyone can be rich! (Score 1) 201

> but standards of living are, in general, going up for everyone Except they're not really. In terms of how many hours of work it costs us to get various "toys" - cars, computers, etc. we're all getting wealthier rapidly, but when you look at the cost of the things we *need* - homes, nutritious food, medical care - most of the population is getting poore at least in the US.

Example: 1970: Median household income was $9,870 (https://www.census.gov/library/publications/1971/demo/p60-78.html) Median cost of a new home: ~$24,000 =2.4 years income (https://www.census.gov/const/uspricemon.pdf)

2016: Median household income $58,000 (https://www.census.gov/search-results.html?q=median+income&page=1&stateGeo=none&searchtype=web&cssp=SERP&_charset_=UTF-8) Median cost of a new home: ~$220,000 = 3.8 years income

The metric you use is incorrect. The issue is not home price/income, it should be home payment/income.

1970: Mortgage rate in 1970 averaged 9%. The payment on a $24,000 home would have been $193/mo or $2,316/yr.
That is 23.5% of annual income.

2019: Mortgage rate in 2019 is currently 4%. The payment on a $220,000 home would be $1050/mo or $12,600/yr.
That is 21.7% of annual income.

We are the ones that have it easier.

Comment Re:Privacy Eroded (Score 1) 63

Are you sure that you want all data flowing around like oxygen and water? Wonder if I want to stalk and kill you. Do you want me to have your address from the DMV and your license plate number?

Records from the California DMV used to be publicly available until someone did get stalked and killed.

Privacy matters.

Slashdot Top Deals

UNIX is hot. It's more than hot. It's steaming. It's quicksilver lightning with a laserbeam kicker. -- Michael Jay Tucker

Working...