The big question for me is this--
The download link only allows you to get the encoded FLV file. Does this mean they failed to store the originals? And if this is so, does that mean YouTube would be serving up the old fashioned h.263 FLV low quality encodes? If that's the case, we'd be much better off _not_ using the auto-move service, as YouTube encodes at much higher quality than Google Video did.
Or, did they just not want us to be sucking their bandwidth by allowing us to download the original footage, but they'll happily transfer it in-house over to YouTube?
Anyone have any pointers?
Ingo,
I believe most desktop users run into this problem when they complain about IO schedulers. Is there any immediate plan to address it?
Thanks,
Jason
An authority is a person who can tell you more about something than you really care to know.