While larger schools may have incoming students with their own laptops, smaller community colleges and colleges with higher percentages of older/non-traditional students will still have need of the local campus computer lab. I attend a small local college of about 1,200 students, many of which are former GM employees. Our campus computer labs are almost always very busy with people typing papers up and so forth. Our campus even utilizes the computer labs for some creative writing and digital photography classes. It seems to me that your particular campus that is shutting down it's computer lab is not considering multiple uses for their labs. It may be they don't need it but still to me it seems as if they are under-servicing their students by not keeping such labs around.

"My geek imagination is now all atwitter imagining an alternate gopher-driven universe."

It looks a lot like this one except everyone has a pointy goatee, including the gopher-driven internet.

"You are accessing a long-distance website, additional charges may apply" I wish bbs' back in the day had that back in the day. I might have not have incurred the wrath of my parents when the phone bill arrived for the first time after I discovered the joy of some out-of-state bulletin boards that had a lot of interesting files that took a while to download on my shiny new 14.4. . . but the bootleg copy of doom II beta was worth the many, many hours damnit! >.>

'Windows Genuine Advantage' is not an advantage but a pain in the ass to deal with. Having to change settings just so I can see file extensions and my own files is a pain as well. I've not tried windows 7, but it sounds like it's built for people who cannot be bothered to ever actually learn about their computers. Let me guess, the Premium Ultra Mega Business Edition will actually allow you to access all of your files in all of the directories. Microsoft is going to annoy those people who know nothing about computers with all the crap it does without telling anyone, and those of us who know anything about computers will get frustrated when the operating system we paid for locks us out of portions of drive. . and then messing with the soundcard so it does not function as intended?!? Who's brilliant idea was that I wonder. I do a bit of amateur music production and because I'm a broke single parent/college student I use my laptop as a recording studio. I use guitar FX pedals connected from the sound output through a mixer--because I hate using a mouse to move sliders--looped back through the audio input. . It seems like such a stupid way to 'stop' the pirating of drm'd music. Those that want to do it can either use an older machine, or use multiple soundcards. This will only really serve to annoy the casual user once again. I wonder if this also would degrade the quality of a non-usb headset mic/headphones. Gah. . Microsoft seems to want to turn computers into a glorified console where the normal user cannot do anything that is not 'allowed' by them. Well, if this is their strategy I'm going to be keeping my XP for many years to come.

Indeed, and the first major tv broadcast was in Germany. . and you know the Germans make good stuff!

Sounds like there is a scourge of man-eating camera-equipped cell phones stalking people in the urban jungle. *insert Australian accent here* "Here we are today stalking the rogue Predator Camera Phone. See how it opens and closes it's terrible jaws, while taking a rather blurry photo of its victim. Crikey, if only it had a warning click its prey could escape!"

I think my old Casio keyboard I got for Christmas in the mid 80's had a more realistic sound to it when ya hit the demo button. This is just bad. . . Sounds like the folks at Microsoft Research have been listening to too much Wesley Willis while trying to come up with ideas. Makes me a bit sad though, Microsoft Research developed the best multi-player game I've ever played; Allegiance (can be found at freeallegiance.org). I hope it was just a slow day at the office for these developers, and they are just scrambling to show M$ something to avoid being laid off. . .

Indeed, back in the early 90's the GM plant in my town (Janesville, WI) retooled the plant in order to build SUV's and light trucks almost exclusively, rather than a mix of trucks and cars. They even got the city and state to build a special access road--that caused several local businesses and homeowners to relocate--to haul materials to and vehicles from the plant. While the plant made some E85 vehicles, the bulk of the vehicles they made were the gas guzzling Yukon, Suburban, Tahoe, etc. The plant is closing regardless of what they do with their stimulus money because they claim they cannot re-tool it to make fuel efficient cars--of course they don't mention the millions the state of Wisconsin paid either directly or through tax incentives to re-tool for the-then profitable SUV market. Really don't know what a good solution for the industry as a whole to do--I don't want to see the automakers fail as I believe strongly in unions and such--but this idea seems a bit odd. I would think that existing manufacturers of railway engines and such would be able to re-tool for such a task for far less than the auto industry could switch over. I think it would be far more likely to switch over to the production of smaller vehicles with more fuel-efficient engines. We are a car culture, and I don't think that is going to dramatically change any time soon.

Spathi > Mycon! Who cares about semi-sentient mushrooms. Terrified meta-mollusks rule! At least until they get scared away. . .