Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:I'm curious to see how many retailers actually (Score 5, Interesting) 732

Actually, when the store owner has to start paying his employees more money to put shit back on the shelf, he may start rethinking if that money on the credit card fees is more worthwhile.

I use a credit card for two reasons.
A) If someone swipes/steals that information, they're stealing VISA's money, not mine. If I use a debit card and they steal my info, they drain my bank account, my mortgage bounces. That's bad.
B) Rewards programs. I get thousands of dollars a year in rewards. I put /everything/ on my credit card. Only thing I don't is my mortgage and that's just because I can't. I pay it off every month. Companies that are going to make this less advantageous for me are going to get less of my business.

Comment Re:I'm curious to see how many retailers actually (Score 4, Interesting) 732

Well, realistically, I'd probably not have gone in the store in the first place if they implemented it, because I'd have hopefully done my homework.

That said, I think it would be important that store owners have a chance to hear their employees go, "yea, I had to put 3x as much stuff back on the shelf today because people keep saying no thanks when they try and charge items to their credit cards".

Other than groceries, I do very little shopping in-store now anyway -- I do most of my shopping online.

Comment Re: Just because they submitted a standard doesn't (Score 1) 211

Alternatively, unless the standard already in place is not extendable or horribly broken, instead of making up their own shit behind closed doors, why couldn't they have approached the community, and got involved.

"Hey, we have some ideas we'd like to try out and would like to help extend the standard, here are our ideas:" ... inclusion as opposed to blind exclusion.

Android

After Android Trial, Google Demands $4M From Oracle 119

MikeatWired writes "Google is seeking $4 million from Oracle to cover the costs it incurred during this spring's epic legal battle over the Android mobile operating system, reports Caleb Garling. In a brief filed in federal court on Thursday night, Google lead counsel Robert Van Nest argued that Oracle is required to pay his company's legal costs because judge and jury ruled in favor of Google on almost every issue during the six-week trial. 'Google prevailed on a substantial part of the litigation,' read Google's brief. '[Oracle] recovered none of the relief it sought in this litigation. Accordingly, Google is the prevailing party and is entitled to recover costs.' Google has not publicly revealed an itemized list of its expenses, but the total bill included $2.9 million spent copying and organizing documents. According to the brief, the company juggled a mind-boggled 97 million documents during the case."

Comment Re:WTF? (Score 2) 809

What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

Comment Re:Hard to get started (Score 1) 192

Slight bias indeed.

The man page to Moose is a good one too.

If you're in to web dev, the Definitive Guide to Catalyst is a good choice, too.

Unfortunately, I have to write this with a caveat: getting Catalyst and Moose set up can take some time. If you apt-get install/emerge/yum/whatever it, you'll probably get an old version.

If you install it from CPAN, it takes some time, since the two of them combine to require a craptonne of CPAN.

That said, once they're installed, a working catalyst web app you can hack on is as simple as catalyst.pl AppName; cd AppName;scripts/appname_server.pl

Comment That's ADORABLE. (Score 1, Insightful) 587

I love how the *AA are intentionally putting themselves out of business.

There can be no other reason.

Music sales are up, movies are still grossing record revenues, Netflix is successful, etc. They keep trying to tell us piracy is bad.

No, piracy offers me a better product. No revoked keys, no work involved in playing my content, I can put it where I want, use it how I want, etc.i

Fucking idiots.

Slashdot Top Deals

The Tao is like a glob pattern: used but never used up. It is like the extern void: filled with infinite possibilities.

Working...