You'd have a point if this was the first country looking to create a national health service. As it isn't, there are plenty of examples. It's not something unknown or unexplainable - it's both known and explained in great depth.

You really don't seem to understand what the EU is or does. Seriously. You're embarrassing yourself.

Yes, the UK bankrupted itself fighting Nazis - many countries did. The money from the EU to other countries is paid by all members, and all receive benefits from it. Reducing it to a simple "they're spending our money!" shows a staggering ingorance of what's actually happening.

And the ECB is not the EU.

You're not really helping dispel the notion that leavers aren't well informed.

It wasn't doing fine. It was doing terribly, actually. Membership of the EEC (and later EU) helped massively. That's why Britain repeatedly tried to join.

If we accept that education is the solution, how do we stem the tide of deaths in the mean-time as we wait for the education to take hold? Or do we not, and just accept that scores of people will die needless deaths?

You don't seem to be aware of the massive benefits to business (and therefor the government via taxes) from being in the EU. It's not just a matter of working out if payments to the EU are greater than payments from the EU. And that doesn't even factor in the number of EU workers propping up vital institutions like the NHS, or the EU immigrants who are paying more taxes than they get from the government, etc. etc. etc.

You're proving their point - people who don't understand the EU being angry about the EU.

And you are incapable of forming an argument. Now what?

And in the mean-time just accept the unnecessary deaths?

If free speech is important, you are admitting it has power. If something has power the thought of constraining it isn't so bizarre, is it? Society has realised that everythign which can be dangerous to society needs to be limited in some fashion.

That this is moderated as "Troll" speaks volumes about slashdot. Oh my how the times have changed.

Read the other charges... You're embarrassing yourself somewhat.

There is a stark difference between performing opposition research by using a domestic company and by using a foreign government.

And if you never lie to the FBI, they'll never charge you with lying to them. Weird, huh?

You are entirely incorrect. Well done.

Nationalised healthcare is cheaper than the US's current system. The US currently spends more per capita on healthcare than any country with nationalised healthcare, without all the benefits. If a person can go to college and get a job which will pay more taxes over their working life than if they did go to college, and if that increase in taxes is more than the cost of tuition, it will pay for itself.

It's not expensive. It's just cutting out lots of companies represented by powerful lobbyists, hence the reluctance of government to do anything about it.

Don't confuse having a wall with controlling borders. The former has vanishingly little to do with the latter.

It's a lot easier to keep equipment like this working when it's not moving around on sand, travel times are reduced massively, and they have lots of access to fresh, cold water.