Journal: Gaewyn L Knight is a creationist idiot - so I made him a foe

Re:What's the Big Fuss (Score:-1)
by Gaewyn L Knight (16566) on Monday November 01, @06:08PM (#10688323)
( http://www.andrews.edu/~freeman/ | Last Journal: Tuesday November 13, @01:53PM )
Yes... but my post was trying to show historical views and how science is ALWAYS going to be questioned by some form of a "god" figure.

Scientists that throw out the idea of any "god" figure performing an intelligent design on our planet just because they can make theories that fit the extremely limited view of time we have makes the scientists even MORE at fault than the religous people that ignore all of sciences facts.

It is nothing but hypocrisy to claim you are doing everything scientifically and provide your theories as facts and automatically dismiss the theories of any other argument.

If the omnipotent God that I believe in as a Christian decided to make the world in 7 days I don't see ANY evidence in any scientific journal that says or even implies it is impossible. Yet daily scientists rebuke religious types as "uninformed radicalists".

Makes me think of a talk one professor of mine had in an archaeological discussion. Have you ever heard of an ancient civilization being dug up and the researchers finding a children's doll? Now we all know that kids must have played over the ages. Yet because scientists must place a meaning on everything and often preconceive that meaning we end up with hundreds of thousands of "statues" to this or that God when in reality a bunch of them were the prehistoric version of a cabbage-patch-kid.
-- "Why me?" - Everyone