Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Courts

Submission + - Apple deception alleged in Proview iPad trademark row (bbc.co.uk)

" rel="nofollow">AmiMoJo writes: "Proview has accused Apple of "deception" in the way it acquired rights to the iPad name. Proview claims Apple created a UK-registered "special purpose company", IP Application Development Ltd (IPADL). The court papers allege that IPADL said the trademark was needed because "it is an abbreviation for the company name". A month after that deal Apple launched the iPad."
Software

Submission + - Apple threatens to pull Siri rival Evi from App Store (delimiter.com.au)

daria42 writes: Steve Jobs might not be around any more to enforce some of Apple's stricter policies, but that doesn't mean the company is letting it all hang loose. Overnight the UK company which produces a speech recognition app called Evi, which mimics many of the functions of Apple's Siri, confirmed Apple had approached his company letting it know that Evi was being reviewed for possible breaches of Apple's App Store policies. The reason? A clause in the policy which bans apps too similar to Apple's existing software. It does appear to matter to Apple that Siri doesn't function that well in the UK, because of a lack of good localisation.

Comment Re:Should government rule our schools? (Score 1) 326

Look at it like a toll road versus a freeway. You pay for the public roadways regardless of whether or not you choose to take the toll road. If you take the free roads to work you may forego certain benefits but at least you're getting something for your money. If you take the toll road you pay extra for whatever benefits you feel you get. Either way, it's your choice. Would you advocate a refund of the money paid out in taxes for the miles you traveled on the toll road? If so, expect lots more traffic on the toll road.

Comment Re:My Father's Cataract Surgery (Score 1) 311

Wonderful story. It's life-transforming for almost everyone who gets the surgery; certainly it was for me. I was mid-50s when I had the surgery. My mother had gone blind from cataracts in the 1960s so I knew it would happen but I was unprepared for the impact it would make. I could swim, kayak and ski without worrying about glasses fogging. And lights at night were pinpoints.

Happy for your father and for you. :)

Comment Re:No correlation (Score 1) 605

I hate to disabuse you but my experience with low-competence speeders is that they often tailgate (trying to make the person in front move over) and also often ignore a free lane apparently under the impression that "slower traffic move right" means "slower than ME") and they single-mindedly seem to insist that everyone has to get out of their way.

But I have also, like you, seen drivers who seem to have a "comfort zone" a car-length behind and won't pass even when given a chance. Some have offered up the idea that staying close helps traffic by increasing the capacity of the highway system but I think that the constant braking required of drivers who follow too closely cancels this out.

My attitude is that it's an intelligence test and finding a way through traffic without slowing everyone else down is what produces a winner. I often hang back and let a few very-high-speed drivers go by to collect the cops; I'll follow them 1/2 mile behind. I use their sudden application of brake lights to tell me when their radar detectors have gone off. :)

Comment Re:The silver lining (Score 1) 605

One of the leading causes of accidents is following too closely and a GPS will not measure that. If tailgating can be correlated to speeding (e.g.: people who speed also follow too closely) then I'd say there could be a good outcome from using this data. Otherwise, not so much...

Slashdot Top Deals

Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.

Working...