I guess he may have seen it but wanted to spread the wrong ideas and lie with numbers.

What Intel mean is that AMD's benchmarks showing their performance is better should be ignored. Even if it's the same benchmark Intel used to show their CPUs was better before.

RISC V or some garbage?

Anyway you remind me if the Appletards who felt superior because their platform didn't had games. Or we'll very selected few which ran like garbage. What a great advantage!

And in the great phones you can't even change to the same piece even from another phone because the parts have serial numbers and oh no can't have the wrong numbered one.

Great company! Watch out for evil Microsoft. Stay free with Apple.

Switch to AMD Zen3 and Windows.

Since the progressives who want to change and manipulate words have also changed the definition of woman to also include people with cocks it could be safer to use the word female instead as that's AFAIK the biological sex then again I guess they will change the meaning of that word too just because why not and hence once again making it hard to actually know what sex someone is. You could of course ask but most people are what they look like and they may be hurt if you ask. Before maybe looks could had told you but as people are fine pumping children with sex hormones nowadays that may no longer be that easy. Plus of course the actual biological difference including not the typical chromosome setup, lower sensitivity for androgenous(?) hormones and whatever else may be going on. (Supposedly a second male child increase the odds of it becoming homosexual, the mothers immune system or hormones may play a role too. As other species may even adapt to whatever sex maybe environmental factors affect it too or at-least sexuality like whatever your dad was there orwhat naked bodies you saw or who had sex with what. Maybe also external synthetic substances which act as hormones.

I saw claims they had 5-6 billion in debt though. Don't know if true but if anyone are interested better check first.

And how are GameStop affected by it?

They could had emitted new stock and raised capital.

I doubt you'll be able to borrow stock without putting up more margin and them being able to call back.

Maybe from some drunk hobo millionaire?

Stocks history.

The company are unlikely worse off.

He only included the new stuff he would have.

I know right.

That's TWICE what I pay for the wife's boyfriendÂs rent so he can live near us.

I shouldn't suggest the moderators are autist retards but they clearly aren't following the language of WSB much. Your comment may not have much information but I still feel a weak informative or funny rating is more appropriate than "troll." Then again moderators don't tend to agree with me! :D

Regarding the risk that's another problem I have with WSB.

A bunch of people have been saying and maybe still are that the short squeeze haven't happened yet.

I don't know and I don't know to what extent but I would imagine that if you are a professional at a big place doing these things that you actually have decided before what risk you are fine with and when you head out to limit that and say that both volume peaks actually may have included people short buying back. But I don't know and I'm not them and this isn't actual market information or data or come from someone who are telling you that this is the case or what will or have happened or are in the know and it's not something you should base your trading or market decisions on.

Personally I'm not convinced whomever say such things on WSB definitely know or are honest about their believes either.

I don't think WSB is a good place to learn about hedge funds and short selling.

Naked short selling seem to be illegal in the USA and hence the other kind of short selling is borrowing someone's stock and then sell to someone else which doesn't increase the amount of stock.
But sure it resulted in one more stock being sold at a time when someone likely thought the odds was worse than for some other investments at-least and that someone is supposed to buy it back at some other time. If you think the market go by fundamentals and actual data and information then I feel that any downward pressure should increase others willingness to buy because it got cheaper but of course in the real world at some time scale people may be a bit of trend followers and trade out of price action. Anyways at that time when someone wanted to sell/short it it would seem to me like it's likely because they think the price is too high and then they buy back hopefully when it feels more worth buying which if it works if anything should help lower the swings in the market and make prices more accurate. Then again we have the trend followers and maybe participants willing to try to trick the market by driving price through specific price points and maybe you could collaborate with someone participating in an emission or something by driving the price down on small volume before or whatever and in the case of the short squeeze (but also possibly breaking specific price levels possibly simply to reverse your position and make money out of those driving volatility) likely rise price even further as you have to rush in and buy.

So maybe this wasn't a convincing argument and also I may not know what I'm talking about I'm just trying to explain it from my understanding and thought about it but they may be incorrect and I'm not a professional on the subject and may be wrong and you shouldn't base or do financial decisions out of what I just wrote. It may just have been waves in quantum fields creating space time which made up this message and nothing serious or thinking entity whatsoever. And I argue against myself I guess :D. The point is really that there's so many sour losers who sit on stick which goes down in price always whining about how it's only because of the short sellers and how it's manipulated and how long can they carry on and bla bla bla whereas I'd like to think people are smarter than that and that there's likely a reason for some things going up in price and others going down in price. But what do I know, the retard autist ape.

I assume some participants may try to drive those watching charts to act but I also assume that long term short sellers likely want to do it on fundamentals and as a long term participant I don't need to care for all the movements if I think it's cheap I could buy and if I think it's too expensive I could sell.

Not financial advice and I'm a nobody. I neither have a wife or is somebodies boyfriend. So in conclusion: Hedge funds and short selling may or may not or be both good and bad & evil. Glad we could clear that out!

Where did I say it affected the age?

I've never said whatever you interpreted it and are replying to.

What I am saying is that we can't see light which haven't reached us and the 93 billion light years across isn't the size of the universe it's the size of THE OBSERVABLE universe.

And that's very relevant because it seem weird to talk about 200 billion galaxies in a universe you don't know how large it is. I assume they mean 200 billion galaxies IN THE OBSERVABLE UNIVERSE. As the universe is expanding at distances far enough it will be expanding faster then the speed of light meaning that whatever the furthest away stuff which right now is capable to send light which will ever reach us will be too far away thereafter to be able to do that again. We can see light from places which by now is too far away to ever reach them even at the speed of light. The light from those places left them a long time ago in a smaller universe.

Also it's not (necessarily) supposed to be a sphere all around it but rather you can hang up multiple collectors around the star. Don't have to build it all at once.