You are way too invested in this to be rational.
I'm saying in a thread about the year of the Wayland desktop that it won't be while they keep considering important features out of scope and then yelling at users about how they stuck and ought to do 1000x more work to make the feature that worked in the previous release of the distro work again.
I'd say if you're happy with it not being the year of the Wayland desktop, then that's fine you do you, except you are clearly unhappy with it. Deeply unhappy with it because when I point out an obvious flaw in the current Wayland desktop experience that's been open for 15 years now and it's unique to Wayland desktops, your response is to yell.
Yell all you want, you won't make it the year of the Wayland desktop by shouting people into submission.
I did read an interesting article recently where it had started to bite. Redhat are all gung ho on Wayland, but the kind of people who pay for support contracts aren't interested at all in slick tablet like desktops. In fact they are not really interested in the community much at all, they are paying redhat for stuff to just work. They run big installations with many screens, lots of custom software and driving expensive machinery and instruments.
It turns out that for those folk, yelling about scope doesn't really carry much weight. However they 15 years of yelling about scope and shouting down users had meant they didn't actually know what their paying users needed until they took it away and the paying users got really annoyed that despite forking over heaps of cash their shit broke.
Anyway I'll just get popcorn, I have bigger or at least other fish to fry. Redhat want Wayland and so it's happening more or less regardless of what I do. I'll keep submitting bug fixes to X tools until the switch happens and then I'll submit them to Wayland tools instead.
I'm still going to laugh at people who shout at users for being wrong then shout at them again for not being as popular as they like.