Russia has a SOF agreement with Ukraine as a part of the Sevastapol lease agreement - good well past a 2017 renewal. It allows for 35,000 Russian Troops in Crimea. The Russians are legally in Crimea under the same kind of frameworks that legally allow US troops in Bhagram, Afghanistan.
The Crimean referendum is being conducted under the precedent most recently, of Kosovo and South Sudan.
Good for the goose? Good for the gander.
But Putin already told us that those 20.000 troops with russian military hardware that man road blocks and besiege ucrainian barracks are in fact not russian soldiers. Also are you certain that those recreational activities are covered in the lease agreement?
It is a more advanced language than the alternative languages, e.g. with its "async" language support.
So... it's just caught up to a subset of Erlang (circa 1985), then?
Cool, Erlang used Monads in 1985. Didn't know that. I have always thought that Erlang uses Agents.
At least in bioiniformatics, the correction of p-values for multiple comparisons ("q-values") has been standard practice for quite a while now.
But then your beta-error goes through the roof and you wont find anything. wouldnt it be far more efficient to repeat the significant experiments.
"A p-value of 0.05 means there's a 5% chance that your paper is wrong. In other words, 1 in 20 papers is bullshit."
This is complete bullshit. If you study something where the h1 is true then there is a 0% possibility to be wrong if you report significant findings.
To me, the battle doesn't even look cool. The ships are all mashed on top of one another, pointing in random directions, and it's almost impossible for an observer to see what's actually going on.
As beings raised in a mostly 2 dimensional plane, it's natural for a truly 3-dimensional no-gravity-bias large-scale interaction to bewilder us. I think this might be one of the things EVE got right.
But space is an incredible boring tactical 3d environment.
Probably won't be able to disable SecureBoot. That's what makes it better!
If it is a certified for Windows 8 x86 machine then it MUST be possible to disable SecureBoot. But you probably already knew that.
It's not Linux's fault that the developers of Final Cut Pro and Lightroom specifically chose *not* to support Linux. It is also not Linux's fault that both Apple and Adobe guard and keep their programs' source code secret, so it is impossible for anyone else to compile it for anything other than the operating systems that these two companies choose to compile these programs for themselves.
Why would i care whose "fault" it is?
Numeric stability is probably not all that important when you're guessing.