> Oh, I see, your top priority is the purchase price.
I don't mind a better repairable one costing more in price, within reason. However, at some point, you have to draw the line and say that this does not make sense any more. At over 100% more, for me, it does not make sense. I am wishing for the trade-off for repairability comes from extreme compactness, rather than price, using commodity components, rather than specially created components by a single manufacturer.
Framework is a great laptop by design and I hope most future laptops go in that direction. However, as it stands, it's price nullifies its advantages for most people. I am not asking for innovation. I am asking for the clock to turn a little back in terms of design.
All I need is an external battery, easy to replace storage and memory and an uncomplicated ventilation solution. We had these common place until relatively recently. I don't need to replace CPU, GPU and the screen. Keyboard replacements should be easy since they sustain mechanical damage by normal use.
Framework goes well beyond this and is currently an enthusiast's interest. I hope they reach the greater market's interest.
Ideally though, we should be able to build a laptop like a desktop, but without relying on components by a single vendor and just like in case with the desktop, it should still make economic sense to do so.