Comment Re:Life Doesn't Just Form (Score 1) 53
It is created.
By something that's not alive, I suppose?
It is created.
By something that's not alive, I suppose?
I thought Empress already did it? Feb 2023.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
S what makes his work so special? (not saying it's an easy thing) But I don't recall her cracking it making news here
Ah, thanks. I didn't know you could borrow shares.
The only surprise is that he isn't selling autographed Trump bibles.
Perhaps I don't understand shorting, but I don't see how you could make a buck shorting this unless you owned shares before the IPO.
The article actually does a good job of talking about this. It even mentions recent problems that they had in Alaska with a cable that got cut because the ice got thicker than they thought possible. I actually think that this is a pretty cool idea (pun totally intended), and I am glad to see these guys making 23 million euros to look into it. Good on them for getting paid to study a very interesting problem.
However, I would be surprised if the cable actual got laid, assuming that the current forecasts are remotely accurate. This fiber optic cable is already forecast to cost 4 times as much as a cable that took the conventional route. It is also going to be considerably more expensive to maintain. The main selling point appears to be that it is less likely to sabotaged (unless your adversary has access to nuclear submarines, I guess), and it is also less likely to be cut by an errant anchor.
There's a reason that so many of the undersea cables follow essentially the same routes. That reason is cost. No one wants to sink hundreds of millions of dollars into a cable that is going to have a serious price disadvantage.
The most recent story on the Havana Syndrome before this was that there was no evidence it was caused by any physical damage. The conclusion was that its not actually a "syndrome" but random symptoms with no common cause.
Whereas the correct conclusion would have been that it is not caused by anything that causes physical damage that we can detect.
Also, Abraham Lincoln was a vampire slayer.
are going out to the investors.
Not to be a wet blanket, but no investment decisions have been made. If you read the article carefully you will realize that they aren't even to the survey stage yet. What they have done is that they have hit the EU up for 23 million euro in funding.
So far the estimated costs of the project are 1 billion euro, and that's projected to be considerably more costly than non-Arctic routes. So they have a lot of fund raising to do if they want to actually make this happen. And, let's face it, the easy money has already been raised. The EU is more than happy to pay 23 million euro, much of which will end up in Nokia's hands, to study this. Actual business people, spending their own money, are likely to be more skeptical. Especially considering the fact that comparable cable that doesn't take this route would only cost 250 million euros.
This article is really just a fancy advertisement for something that is probably not a good idea. The article actually does a good job of covering that part of the story. You have to read down a ways, but it is worth it. True to form the EU has already invested heavily in this project. I personally think that says more about EU spending than on the viability of the Northwest Passage for fiber optic cables.
If, on the other hand, you felt strongly enough about the direction that the climate was headed on this planet that you wanted to make a big bet on the Northwest Passage becoming a viable route for fiber optic cables, I suspect that their is an opportunity here to put your money where your mouth is. These people are going to need a lot more money than they currently have if this is to get off the drawing board.
Now they should sell NFTs commemorating the, ah, "lost" money.
"respect the wishes of the picture subject and the copyright holder"
You can certainly make an argument for the former, but as for the latter, the copyright holder in this case has been aware of the image's use for decades and taken no action to defend their copyright. Case law on this is clear: they have no claim at this point. Further, the implication of legitimate academic and research use over the course of several decades would itself make any copyright claim difficult at best. At this point, it is highly unlikely that the wishes of the copyright holder matter, from a legal perspective.
nice commercial
if you want us to read anything fix your fucking enter key
He doesn't go for modern technology.
Every time I hear about more sanctions I'm puzzled that they didn't go scorched earth when the war first started.
What is research but a blind date with knowledge? -- Will Harvey