They only find out your IP address after it's too late.
Chain of authenticity is provided by each parent domain signing the delegation records provided by the child domain.
So, for the "government" to "exert control" over your domain, they would have to completely spoof every parent of your domain. This would affect not just your domain, but all domains in that TLD. Pretty sure if everyone in
Or they could pressure the parent domain into signing their own bogus delegation records, the same way they currently can pressure them into serving bogus delegation records (such as customs seizing all those trademark-and-copyright-infringing domains a few days ago). This relies entirely on each parent domain being trustworthy about what they sign, which is a bit difficult if you don't trust the government that they're subject to.
but it's a great concept. Why should someone have your data with out you knowing and better yet why should they keep it if you ask it to be destroyed.
What I know, is mine. This, is saying that my knowledge is not mine and can be taken from me. Really, it looks like the next step from those absurd libel laws where truth isn't a defense. What's the next step after this one, require that anyone can have anyone else dragged off to get portions of their memory medically erased?
Seriously, it sounds like they've got it all, even down to the "sue your (ex-) customers" part. I suppose that means that someone should check that the monopoly privileges in question really do belong to them.
It does not matter what you think personally, if you say it under the company name, (your name is the company name if you are an employee), then you are representing the company at all times. If you have something to say then say it under another name.
As someone else linked upthread, Fuck that shit.
are you going to stop them?
No, I'm going to laugh at them. I thought that was the whole point of it being posted here, actually.
you are NOTHING
Well yeah, but the (lack of) meaning of life is a bit oversized of a topic for here.
the right of a non-state capitalist, for profit corporation to build structures on land where the land owners and local government have decreed they want no such structures?
that is COMMUNIST.
No, I think it's actually closer to fascist. Communists don't have "non-state capitalist, for profit corporations", remember?
He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion