That's not true - we're creating plenty of CO2 in the mining process

I'm sure there are, but it still doesn't change the fact that neither RBG or CMYK can cover the full gamut that Pantone colors are available for.

The obvious things are tones like different ranges of black, metallic hues, flourescent colours, etc... Things that are reasonable (possible pricey) to specify for print, but that are outside of the normal CMYK range. But in print, if you want a nice, clean, even colour, you want a dedicated ink for that. You don't want a dithered print. Look at a cereal box corner sometime - there's usually a registration print with little color samples. You'll see the usual CcMmYK colors for the bulk of the printing, but you'll almost always see a handful of pure colors as well. These are the registered pantone colors that get their own dedicated ink on the presses. You need this if you want your logo to be a solid color, even up close. Otherwise, you'll have that mess of various tones, pixelated, and imperfectly aligned.

There is also issue that cmyk and RGB don't fully cover the range that inks and pigments exist in. You can have Pantone colors that aren't selectable by RGB alone.

I live in Winnipeg, so I think that gives me some credibility for what real cold weather is. Before COVID, when I used to go into the office (I've been working from home since March 2020), I commuted every day to work on bike. When the snow hits, I switch over to my single-speed garbage bike. I've got some good knobby tires on it, and it handles everything except fresh powder. I wear a neck gaiter and toque. When it gets real cold I have some quality gauntlets, and I have some water-proof over-pants I wear to keep off slush and wind.

Anecdotal, I'll admit, but I finally retired my LGG4 (from 2015) last week. I was looking at having to replace the battery again, and decided it was time - there were too many apps that it no longer supported. But otherwise I had no complaints.

If the goal is to reduce water usage, then the free market way is to just tax water usage. Trying to tax specific crops is just overcomplicating things and is likely to lead to workarounds, loop-holes or unintended consequences. Tax the thing you want to solve, not some proxy. That way, if someone starts growing almonds in some new low-water-usage method, good for them.

I have an LG G4 that I really have no desire to leave behind. How is Lineage OS?

If I produced actual legible notes, I'd have that issue, but my "notes" are largely just scribbles that even I couldn't read later. But I still take notes to force my self to try and extract the main points of what is being presented. Otherwise, I'll tune out after five minutes and start meal planning, or designing a solution for some ticket at work, or working on a civ iv strategy...

That does, of course, mean that of you're training an AI with past data, you need to counter the existing biases in order to get a fair selection criteria.

No, but if you're the NBA and your AI decides, based on input data, to prefer people with black names, then yes.

Yup - it was lightweight enough that I could play MP3s on my DX4/100 without stuttering.

I find that a diligent understanding of bovine excrement usage solves a great deal of problems these days.

Don't you worry about wind cancer getting into your crops?

If we're just looking for things that kill viruses in a petri dish, there're lots of options.