Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - 'Russia Might Have Caused Havana Syndrome' (washingtonpost.com)

An anonymous reader writes: A just-published investigation by Russian, American and German journalists has unearthed startling new information about the so-called Havana syndrome, or “Anomalous Health Incidents,” as the government calls the unexplained bouts of painful disorientation that U.S. diplomats and intelligence officers have suffered in recent years. The new information suggests but does not prove that Russia’s military intelligence agency is responsible. Earlier, agencies in the U.S. intelligence community had concluded that “it is very unlikely a foreign adversary is responsible.” They need to look again. [...]

[T]he new investigation by the Insider, a Russian investigative news outlet, in collaboration with CBS’s “60 Minutes” and Germany’s Der Spiegel, paints a different picture. It identifies the possible culprit as Unit 29155, a “notorious assassination and sabotage squad” of the GRU, Moscow’s military intelligence service. Senior members of the unit received “awards and political promotions for work related to the development of ‘non-lethal acoustic weapons’” — a term used in the Russian military-scientific literature to describe both sound- and radiofrequency-based directed energy devices. The investigation found documentary evidence that Unit 29155 “has been experimenting with exactly the kind of weaponized technology” experts suggest is a plausible cause. Moreover, the Insider reported, geolocation data shows that operators attached to Unit 29155, traveling undercover, were present in places where Havana syndrome struck, just before the incidents took place.

Even more concerning, the investigation found that a commonality among the Americans targeted was their work history on Russia issues. This included CIA officers who were helping Ukraine build up its intelligence capabilities in the years before Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022. One veteran of the CIA Kyiv station was named the new chief of station in Vietnam and was hit there. A second veteran of the CIA in Ukraine was hit in his apartment in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. Both these intelligence officers had to be medevaced and were treated at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. The wife of a third CIA officer who had served in Kyiv was hit in London. “Of all the cases” examined by the news organizations, they said, “the most well-documented involve U.S. intelligence and diplomatic personnel with subject matter expertise in Russia or operational experience in countries such as Georgia and Ukraine,” both of which were the scene of popular pro-Western uprisings in the past two decades. The news organizations point out that Russian President Vladimir Putin has often blamed these “color revolutions” on the CIA and the State Department. They conclude, “Putin would have every interest in neutralizing scores of U.S. intelligence officers he deemed responsible for his loss of the former satellites.”

Comment Re:500,000 is nothing (Score 1) 120

That market you're talking about taxes the everloving fuck out of petrol in the Netherlands, with a price being about $2.16 per litre according to the Internets. Whereas in the US we're looking at around $3.00 per US gallon, or about $0.80 per litre.

If petrol was $0.80 or less per litre how eager would they be switching over to EVs?

EVERY market is distorted, you just have different places it happens and different amounts.

Comment Re:Kids Show (Score 2) 29

The show was entertaining. It was not as good as Next Gent or DS9 as its height, and a few parts felt more Star Wars than Star Trek, but overall it is very well done. One should not skip it just because it is labeled as a kids-show. I suggest giving it at least the first few episodes.

Comment Re:First ask the question... (Score 2) 78

According to the article, they're focused right now on ADUs, or "Accessory Dwelling Units". That's corporate-speak for smaller units as 2nd dwellings on existing lots. Think "in-law suite". So cost of land would be close to zero as it is already a sunk cost. In reality the tax assessment would rise as the value of the property goes up, but that'd depend on the details of State law on propery tax increase limits, etc.

And a housing bill making its way through the Massachusetts Legislature could create a new market overnight for the company by making it much easier to plant so-called accessory dwelling units (ADUs) of up to 900 square feet in the backyard of any single-family home in the state.

Comment Not the issue (Score 5, Informative) 119

Boeing's problems have very little to do with DEI. The primary problems came from when Boeing merged with the then struggling McDonnel Douglas and somehow the MD management ended up almost completely in charge. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/01/boeing-737-max-corporate-culture/677120/. They even moved the corporate headquarters to be deliberately further away from the factories and engineers. So what was once one of the most engineering focused of businesses became completely business focused.

Comment Construction cost is not the problem (Score 4, Informative) 78

Construction cost is not the main problem. The main problem is that regulation has made it almost impossible to build new housing at a reasonable speed. This has gotten to the point where a few years ago when an apartment building burned down in Allston (a Boston suburb) it took years just to get the permits to rebuild the existing building. This is part of a much wider problem in the US where building rules, construction rules, zoning, etc. all has combined very badly.

Comment Re:It's surprising people still don't get it. (Score 1) 282

Actually, -10 F doesn't really impact an EV. A little less range is all. [1][2] The issues seen in some parts of Chicago last winter were specific to a set of charging stations that had issues, not EVs in general. It was cold all over, and only a couple of charging stations had issues.

One of my coworkers was in South Dakota over the frigid spell, visiting his mother. He was planning on driving home (Virginia), but SD was telling all cars to stay off the road -- it was so cold that oil wasn't warming enough and gasoline engines were siezing up on the road. Diesel was already gelled, so they weren't going anywhere for the duration.

I agree, the binary thinking is irritating. I made my decision based on having at home charing, minimal long distance driving, and fairly near population centers just in case. It is a different calculation if you can't charge at home.

[1] Not including Nissan Leaf's, the one major EV that doesn't have a temperature regulated battery. Everyone else learned from them and conditions the batteries.

[2] Percentage drop is just that, a percentage. I'll take a 20% drop from a base of 105 MPGe over a 10% drop from a 30 MPG any day.

Comment Re:Not so much peer review as glance review. (Score 1) 22

Journals don't have their own labs. Other labs are supposed to replicate research claims, not journals. Also, a major part of the system is the assumption in reviewing that scientists may be mistaken, but they aren't engaging in deliberate fraud. If reviewers were expect to somehow detect that and look for it every single time, refereeing (which is already a pretty thankless task) would become nearly impossible. And when this does happen, it eventually gets found out. If there is a solution here, it is to have more serious repercussions for faking results than there are.

Comment Re:It's surprising people still don't get it. (Score 1) 282

This exactly. Not having the garage and having to install the pedestal and buried lines, that was my big cost. I spent the extra $50 for the pedestal that can mount two chargers and left a pull-rope in the oversized buried conduit. At any time I can install a second charger for pretty much just the price of the charger -- a couple hundred $$.

Comment Re:It's surprising people still don't get it. (Score 1) 282

You can cherry pick rare-if-never scenarios all day long. I'm telling you from experience these are molehills and you're imagining mountains.

The odds of both cars being driven until dead and needing to charge RIGHT NOW is about the same odds as me hitting Powerball lotto.

You're missing the point that normally the car is FULLY TOPPED OFF EVERY MORNING -- 250ish miles of range -- so the scenarios you're dreaming up are verging on the impossible. I mean me driving 250 miles in one day and absolutely needing to charge assumes I was comfortable with coasting in to my driveway on fumes instead of just stopping somewhere to add some charge for 5-10 minutes. At the same time, my kid's car is driven to dead and no one bothered to charge at all...just go to the nearest fast charger and hit it for 5-10 mintues.

Comment Re:It's surprising people still don't get it. (Score 2) 282

You know EVs have a charge gauge similar to a fuel gauge, right? No fire drill necessary. End of day, plug car in. First ride, unplug car. Other car is wife's/kid's issue and they just unplug mine and plug theirs in if needed. Oh, and there are apps for that.

Again, with the limited mileage the average American puts on a vehicle (~ 30 miles a day), there is no "keep up". No anxiety of "do I have enough charge". Just drive the car, charge when you need to if you go far, plug in when you get home. It really just blends into the background and is MUCH easier than stopping at a gas station.

Comment Re:It's surprising people still don't get it. (Score 2) 282

The scenario presented was charging at home with multiple EVs, so don't move the goalposts with not charging at home being an issue. That's a different question with a different answer.

My one charger is in the center, at the end of my driveway. The cable reaches both vehicles without issue. My EV is more convenient than ICE ever way. Every day I leave fully topped off, which never happens with an ICE vehicle. I don't have to wait for my vehicle to warm up before driving, or worry about the engine oil not being warm enough to protect the engine. No timing chain, no serpentine belt, no points, plugs, transmission, engine oil, and no concerns about contaminated gasoline.

If an EV isn't worth it for you, wonderful. You do you. But the scenario presented that I was responding to is a non-EV owner's fears and not realistic. That's all I was pointing out.

Comment Re:It's surprising people still don't get it. (Score 1) 282

The cord is long enough to reach the cars. Each car takes about two hours a day worth of charge, sometimes less. I can let them sit for days without charging on normal usage.

This isn't a matter of diligent. People overthink charging if you have a home charger. I plug in at the end of my last trip of the day and unplug on the first. If one of the kids needs the charger, they charge. I leave my driveway every day fully topped off. Zero people do that with gasoline cars. If I drive so much I need to charge during a trip, I do. It just isn't an issue.

I understand it can be depending on where you live, availability of chargers, etc. this can vary. But the specific scenario mentioned is one that never would be mentioned by someone who actually owns an EV in that situation because it just isn't an issue.

Slashdot Top Deals

Remember, UNIX spelled backwards is XINU. -- Mt.

Working...