Did anybody else read this and think of the singularity? I sure did.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity

SixD

I like this direction of thinking, personally.

Some of our best and brightest minds in space exploration today have already pointed out that the International Space Station represents a test-bed for sustainability in many ways, and an ecosystem controlled and defined by human activity. Sustainability is one of the greatest goals for humanity, if not the greatest!

Also, to think that all the major advancements in space exploration have happened in, what, the last 40-50 years? What could we do if we really put our minds to it? It's hard to know what benefits could be had, and I think that's always been a challenge - showing the present value of something whose benefit is reasonably unpredictable. We need entrepreneurs and risk-takers to take stabs at these challenges because it is these groups of people who help us quantify, discover and explore what the actual benefits are. Lastly, it's not about failing - it's about what we will not learn by not trying!

This is why things like "Google Labs" exist, in my opinion. Just imagine if every company had a formal "Labs" entity within IS/IT. The only problem is that being able to have a free-flowing anything goes R&D-type department (which is separate from your ordinary every-day "structured" or process-based type department) usually requires corporate support, a company of a certain size, enough people, or enough discipline to separate R&D time from planned/organized/structured time.

I believe the core purpose behind Agile methods was originally to support what comes naturally to most developers, which is light-process and getting things done incrementally (which as I recall, is even a practice used in total quality management/TQM). So, really, many of us do "agile" intrinsically in some form, unless you work in a monolithic situation, a large company, one that makes complex or very expensive products that require lots of up-front planning/documentation, or one that requires traditional SDLC/waterfall/project-planning type processes.

If you built an aircraft carrier using agile methods, vs traditional project planning, I wonder, what would the difference be?

SixD

I had the pleasure of meeting Dr. Ed Stone at a recent NASA event, one of those chief engineers, if only briefly. It really is stunning to think of these most-distant man-made objects and what it must be like where they are.

When I asked him how he felt knowing that something he worked on was so far away, his answer was quite short and honest in a humble engineering sort of way: "pretty fantastic"! So absolutely fantastic, indeed!

Whence has the spirit of exploration gone, and how can we keep it strong?

Oh, and when was the last time it needed a reboot?

-6d

A friend of mine just got a job as a research physicist studying fusion, after a few other career moves in real estate, big oil companies etc. In his own words, it is "real science, a real job, and a real pursuit". I'm somewhat inclined to agree with him.

I'm with you - I build business software applications for a living, and it pays the bills and affords a certain degree of freedom. However, at the end of the day I find myself struggling to answer the question, "what will the lasting contribution of my work to our lives or society be?". I don't need to be famous, but will I have contributed anything other than just my existence? Perhaps it doesn't matter if I make a major contribution or not, or maybe we make them without even knowing it.

That said, I'd much rather be figuring out how to mitigate human suffering, contributing in a meaningful way to human knowledge or simply be researching how to make living/surviving in extreme conditions (i.e. the "new" weather patterns on our planet, space, underwater) better.

-SixD

What's with all the hosted bookmarks/social bookmarking sites looking like they are going to close down all of the sudden? XMarks nearly did, but they sold out to somebody else. Maybe that company (lastpass?) can buy delicious too and maintain both products.

Imagine a Beowulf cluster of th^H^H^H

Ah, forget it, the darn thing practically is one already! :/

"Imagine exactly ONE of those" just doesn't sound the same.

Sure, you're right. Perhaps it's a bit of wishful thinking showing through. Nitpicking aside, is it not a positive trend that we are getting annoyed by stories of people trying to send up these balloons? There has to be some reason multiple people have been motivated to do more of these "experiments" or whatever you want to call them. I'm HOPING it's because they are interested in space, science, and fun.

I would hope that we would rather consider the meaning of the fact that the general public has an interest in reaching space again, and by doing it themselves. Sure, maybe a balloon to the upper reaches of the atmosphere is not anywhere close to launching an Atlas rocket, but I for one am glad that people are still dreaming, and experimenting!

We are one step closer to idiocracy! I for one welcome my new "AOL Time Warner Taco Bell US Government Long Distance" overlords.

Mmmm.. foamy lattes.

-6d

Hello, devil's advocate here... I totally agree with the sentiment that keeping things simpler is preferable, and that there are problems created by programmers who either don't care, are trying to preserve their job security (or pad their resumes with buzzwords), don't know better, or don't take the time to think out the design/maintainability of what they are doing.

On a recent project to provide real-time, asynchronously updating, data-driven, interactive graphs and gauges on a modern web application, I had no choice other than to make use of: HTML, CSS, jQuery, Javascript, XML, Flash, PHP, CodeIgniter framework, SQL (MySQL), SimpleUnit, etc. It is always frustrating to realize that we basically have to program in 6 or so different languages/tools (or more) to accomplish something. As you pointed out, even I probably omittted a plethora of other little utilities, supporting infrastructure or OS functionality that was used to support this app.

So, I know your circumstances might have been specific, but, how else do you propose one to meet such a requirement, given today's bag of technology options? The complexity today is just the nature of the beast........ which is why it's ever more important to try darn hard to K.I.S.S.

-6d

** This post was automatically generated by a computer **

Just got a Droid 2 and was transferring my old phone numbers over. I had just transferred the Google 411 number, and then jumped on Slashdot and determined I shouldn't bother!

It was nice to have, even though I suppose it's not as necessary with a smartphone. Still, cheaper than calling 411 on my carrier!

So long and thanks for all the fish!

6d

Heh, I see. Perhaps the old meme "^([0-9]*)(PB|GB|TB|MB|KB|B|Pb|Gb|Tb|Mb|Kb|b) should be enough for anyone$" needs to be revised since we're always running out of something, somewhere.

So the answer really comes down to.. need to boil the ocean? Get a bigger pot!

I was once told by another fellow Slashgeek, regarding the IPv6/IPv4 debate, that "one cannot boil the ocean"! I think we probably need these interim steps and solutions.. that's probably the only way things will continue working during the changeover. We do have to be careful not to fall into the trap of implementing an interim measure and getting stuck with it for a long time, when the better solution is almost never reached as soon as was desired. How many systems get implemented to be "temporary" and then become production for years?

At the same time, massive direct cutover changes almost never work. Although, that may not be entirely true - the recent change from analog to digital television seems to have gone reasonably well and that was a direct cutover.

6d