Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Very Common (Score 1) 59

I've seen this happen several channels I've followed. Usually it starts with them being tricked into installing malicious software by targeted phishing or using google ads to trick people into downloading modified versions of popular software. Once the software is installed, the hackers have remote access and will eventually gain access their accounts, usually starting with Gmail. They use their YouTube access to trick people to purchase crypto or who knows what because Elon musk is saying you will get double of it back. They'll also try and drain your bank account and basically do whatever they can do to exploit whatever they can. I don't know what the case is here, but there's a good chance they got access to more than just his YouTube.

Comment Re:I applaud their mission (Score 1, Interesting) 16

Google seems only good for searching things local to your area. Researching things has become a pretty painful experience, constantly clicking on websites barely relevant to the search or not relevant at all. And a good deal of the time the websites are borderline functionally unusable. Maybe it's not all google's fault. But it's pretty clear that google at this point is purposefully inefficient and likely optimized for profit.

I've been using DDG more and more and google less and less. I somewhat disagree that the "ask a question" format is necessarily bad. ChatGPT has proven the format can be pretty effective researching things and save a lot of time in many cases. I'm just not sure how much money there is in that (or where it comes from).

Comment Re:Youtube ads (Score 2) 50

The content they offer now, after they've purged a very significant amount of "non-corporate" media, is not worth the $12/month to avoid the ads, either.

YouTube never purged any non-corporate media, and there's no shortage of content. In fact, a good deal of creators from other platforms like Twitch, TikTok, and Instagram also upload their content to YouTube. There was a brief period where they did a massive change to how things were monetized which led to some creators changing their content or quitting, but that's pretty much in the past. And whoever quit is just replaced by other creators.

It's funny to me when people say they don't watch YouTube because of lack of content, when almost literally everything is on YouTube

I do pay for YouTube, but that also comes with YouTube Music which is something else I use a lot. It's very worth it for me, and to be honest I'd probably pay more.

Comment Re:Thanks for the warning (Score 4, Informative) 105

I don't believe you when you say it used to only contain cream, milk, sugar, and vanilla, though. I don't think I have ever seen an ice cream recipe anywhere that did not call for at least some salt - and I would not want to eat it because I am sure it would taste either like cardboard or could only be sickeningly sweet.

The ingredient list was their entire advertising campaign.

Comment Re:Not as good as Eliza (of 30 years ago) (Score 0) 33

It doesn't have to pass a Turing test to be useful.

Plus there's needs to be an extra human involved for it to fail a Turing test.

It kinda sounds like you wanted it to fail, and thus had a bad experience. You quickly determined it was a bot, though it already told you it was. And the end result is now BlenderBot3 thinks you're antisocial.

Comment They're all fine (Score 1) 100

I use Opera, Brave, Firefox, Chrome, Edge regularly. They all work fine.

Chrome is my default on Windows
Opera has pretty much been my Chrome on Linux
Firefox I just use as a second browser vs having separate windows, or sometimes primary browser on Linux
Edge is good for viewing pdfs on Windows
Brave I will probably replace Opera with ...

Comment Re:Misplaced priorities (Score 1) 128

Chat is fine until you try to do any kind of search (which Microsoft consistently can't seem to figure out) or copy the chat text (which can be impossible for whatever reason) or try to go back in time for a long chat (something Microsoft seemed to not even take into account). Very unprofessional professional software as usual.

Comment Re:Hardware 2FA (Score 1) 52

I saw no mention of hardware 2FA, like yubi keys or rsa devices...are they currently immune to these attacks?

I think not, because the attack only happens after you're already hacked, or logged into a hacked network. You're communicating with a malicious computer (Man In The Middle) that is just forwarding everything back and forth to the real site until it gets the session cookie. Once it has the session cookie, they can access the website without you. I don't think the technologies you mentioned can account for this. It's more a problem on the websites end. Which is one reason many websites are suspicious of logins from new devices.

Comment It's just a smart tv (Score 1) 60

Just replace whatever smart software (Roku etc..) with Amazon's. I don't see how this is a problem. Especially for people who use Amazon regularly anyway, which is a very large amount. Plus you can still connect any other streaming box of your choice if you want to ignore the "smart" software, or like the portability of being able to move the box to different televisions.

And for the conspiracy theorists out there, anything shady Amazon may do, the company that build you're existing smart tv could do the same.

Slashdot Top Deals

2.4 statute miles of surgical tubing at Yale U. = 1 I.V.League

Working...