Who the fuck modded this retardation "Informative"?

Life, ... uh,...finds a way.

They said they were going to remove content that violated WHO recommendations.... Well, conspiracy-theory crap is definitely something that I'm sure the WHO is against. So, YT should just delete the channels spreading this junk and be done with it. Problem solved.

We have the technological capability RIGHT NOW to suck the CO2 right out of the atmosphere and sequester it. Every continent, every nation, needs to build these atmosphere processors to do just that. Imagine, Russia with a thousands of them. Imagine the US and Canada with an equal number. Think the same for Australia (hello to my down-under friends), and Africa with so many it would be hard to count. The building of these processors will take time, yes, and resources--a lot--but the truth of the matter is clear: Do nothing, we all die; do something we all might live. Get them designed, get them built. Do it now and power the things up. There are jobs there--countless jobs--we can make "Saving the planet for human habitation" as the start of the next several centuries' economy of the world.

I'd be happy if Twitter and all social-media companies simply enforced their rules universally. If I post something incendiary, a flagrant violation of the rules, I get suspended/banned--as it should be. Donald Trump or Alex Jones or any "celeb" does it, and it is just A-OK with them--because ad revenue. No, I'm sorry, but screw that. The rules apply to all, or they should apply to none. Hell, look at that moron Logan Paul and what he did on Youtube...he was given a slap on the wrist and that was it. But other accounts were whole-sale deleted by them for doing far less...again because of ad revenue. Enforce the rules or do not have any. That is the only way. Nobody should be above the law. Not me, not my mother, not the President, not Kim Kardashian, ... nobody.

There will, following this absurd law, be women on boards, which is the goal; but they will have zero say and power. Their presence will be purely for the so-called "optics" of it: Feel good reactionism. This is tokenism at its finest, boys and girls. If California chooses to be so stupid as to embrace this ideological idiocy, then California will shortly discover themselves to be in possession of female board members that are there for the photo op, and nothing more. Then these ladies, and the feminist organizations, will cry foul. Place in positions of power those that are qualified, not those that meet a societal requirement. Only then will you have real success. If women want to be on a board, that's fine, but you must first prove that you belong through your merits, not because you happen to be the proud bearer of a uterus.

"Montanez was stopped for failing to yield properly. After being pulled over, the officer asked to search his car; Montanez refused, so the officer held him until a drug dog was brought in to give the officer enough probable cause to search the vehicle." https://www.oyez.org/cases/201... From the SCOTUS decision: "Absent reasonable suspicion, police extension of a traffic stop in order to conduct a dog sniff violates the Constitution’s shield against unreasonable seizures." Cop dun screwed tha' pooch.

Fark isn't, and hasn't been, relevant in nearly a decade. This is just Drew, the whiny owner of Fark, bending over backwards to please advertisers. This is a PR move, based on money, nothing more.

How can this tactic not qualify as defamation? With the huge number of screwed up lawsuits over bittorrent piracy going on, it would only be a short while before they "outed" the wrong person...and then they would be liable. What then? They apologize and hope that they don't get sued? Screw that. They start this mess, they mess with the wrong person, the first thing would be "lawyer up!" and counter file against them--and make them eat their words.

You know, I'd take the claim a hell of a lot more seriously if they hadn't waited so damn long since the first appearance of the character in Episode VI. This whole thing just smacks of BS to me. I don't recall any other "asian" group complaining about Jabba. No, this is all about "appease us or we'll throw a fit!"

Does he plan to ban the sale of booze and tobacco as well? They're far more dangerous to the health of the populace than 32 ounces of Mountain Dew.

No. You cannot be compelled to break the law.

You need to tell the bosses that because you just saved the company mucho moolah by doing this haphazardly, you deserve a raise; otherwise you no longer feel comfortable supporting the code since that's really not your job. Sure, it works *now*, but later you can't really expect. Who knows what bugs crept in when you weren't looking--after all, this is way above your pay grade. Also, look into being able to write off your personal time/equipment on your taxes, since that's where the development was taking place. Additionally, see if FLSA kicks in, since you pretty much volunteered time/effort to the company without compensation.

If they agree that this is valid, then just thinking about robbing a bank is the same as actually doing it. Thoughtcrime, anyone?