Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Shock news: first Amendment has limits too (Score 3, Informative) 496

It never ceases to amaze me how people are able to seize on the Amendments to justify their own short-sighted, stupid, destructive, extremist and anarchist hankerings.

Of course there are limits to how far you can push your first-amendment rights; there have to be. See e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution and scroll down to Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes who formulated the clear and present danger test for free speech cases.

Thing is, Holmes was wrong in that case.

Comment Re:Good (Score 2) 459

He didn't "break in". He sent requests to a publicly-accessible web server, and AT&T sent back private information.

Like sending "requests" to a publicly-accessible ATM using cards with other people's information on them, and then taking the money the bank "willingly" gives you.

Yeah, I totally see the difference between that and "breaking in" to an ATM.

No, that would be like to trying to impersonate people by guessing their passwords. In Weev's case, there was no authentication to circumvent.

Comment Re:Good (Score 4, Informative) 459

Isn't a key element of the legal case that he also retransmitted the private information? He did not merely receive it.

From the court filing, it appears both charges are predicated on the notion that sending GET requests to an unprotected, publicly-accessible web server constitute unauthorized access under Title 18, Section 1030(a)(2)(C).

Comment Re:Good (Score 4, Insightful) 459

Meatspace analogy :

If a bank didn't have a door on it's vault, or any forms of security whatsoever, would you walk in and take out all the money? Even if you proceeded directly to the local police department to report the security flaw and deliver the unguarded money, you'd find yourself in quite a bit of trouble.

Here's a better analogy: you send the bank self-addressed stamped envelopes, and they willingly send private information about their clients back to you in those envelopes.

Comment Re:Good (Score 4, Insightful) 459

Nearly everything Weev does is malicious, but the question is: is it (or should it be) illegal? He was convicted of identity fraud and "conspiracy to access a computer without authorization". Think about that: requesting unprotected publicly-accessible webpages is "access[ing]" a computer without authorization". By that standard, anyone who uses the internet could be convicted of a crime.

Comment Re:Existing non-electronic variant (Score 2) 145

From the article, the device is $2. BUT...they don't include the "coin battery" that it runs on...I'm guessing a 2032 or 2025, which will cost close to as much as the rest of the device. I do wonder how they get the cost of the unit that low, though...

Sure, if you're buying them one-at-a-time at Target, but you can get 50 CR2032 batteries for $10 on Amazon. Buying in bulk, they'd be even cheaper. (I go through a lot of button batteries, mostly LR44s, keeping my kids' toys running.)

Comment Re:Clip (Score 1) 1862

I don't currently make it to the range weekly (family, job, etc.), but I would if I could. At a typical range visit, I'll typically go through 2-300 rounds of .22 and about 100 rounds of 9mm (and that's if I'm shooting alone!). For economy (shipping in particular), I buy reloaded 9mm cartridges by the case (1000 rounds), and I usually buy 10 bricks (5250 rounds) at a time of .22. So I routinely have >6000 rounds stored, and that's purely for target shooting.

Slashdot Top Deals

Stellar rays prove fibbing never pays. Embezzlement is another matter.

Working...