Or, like I like to put it, these people all speak vulgar Latin.
Don't you mean Latina vulgaris?
"Apple has done this not so well," writes the company. "Face ID can be fooled by mask, which means it is not an effective security measure."
Isn't that true of any biometric-only authentication system? Fingerprint, face, iris, voice... they can all be emulated with enough effort. It's a darn convenient security measure, however, which under the right circumstances is augmented by a strong passcode.
It's one thing to huff and puff, it's another to take action. Did these communities that "rejected Comcast" actually build their own networks, or are they still using the service that they supposedly rejected?
The communities did not reject Comcast - they voted in favor of allowing the city to provide Internet access (alongside all existing providers.) It's now up to the city to put together a plan to fund and provide that access, and get approval for that plan. In Longmont COs case, once the city voted to exempt itself from the ban, the city proposed floating a bond to fund the build-out, which was approved by the city in yet another vote. The city then did in fact built out a gigabit fiber service. And it's awesome.
They can't take what they dish out. What a surprise.
Where do you see that people had their feelings hurt? Muskâ(TM)s comments, both serious and joking, were highly upvoted or even gilded.
TSLA isn't plunging today (as of time of writing, the pre-market has it down less than 2%, and I bet it'll close similar to or higher than it started, because there's a lot of bulls looking to buy on weakness).
Good call. With less than an hour to the closing bell, not only is TSLA higher than it's starting price as you predicted, it's 1.5% higher than yesterday's closing.
a flaw with the program not VS.
Sorry, meant to say "a flaw with the program not the user/victim."
"Are you sure you want to discard ALL changes? This is IRREVERSIBLE!"
I certainly blame the victim for not having backups. But given the wording here, I don't blame them for not realizing that this would delete everything. I guess the import deleted the source as everything was being imported, after which the files were in a pending state, and the discard then deleted the pending files without putting them back to the source prior to the import...? Or maybe the import process marked the files as "these belong to me now" inside of VS, with a pending status, and the discard is programmed to delete pending files regardless of how they became pending? Either way, that sounds like a flaw with the program not VS. Of course, perhaps during the import process there's some big red warning saying "This import process marks all files as pending and does not preserve the source of the files, so discarding these files will erase the source you are importing from unless you commit them."
Disclaimer: not a VS user.
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." -- Albert Einstein