In the end, this is correct. I was posting about actual arson that I witnessed. The official narrative was that all the reports of arson were false, which I am sure is why the "fact checkers" squashed me. There were many false reports of arsonists, there were also many real incidents of arson that authorities and media seemed to want very much to suppress. Local people tried really hard to get the word out on what was really happening here, but it seems like it was all distorted or silenced depending on the platform. The causes of some of the fires were never determined, but of all of the fires that occurred that week within 100 miles of me that I know of, around half of them were probably arson and several people were caught in the act of starting fires including the one I personally witnessed. But everybody wanted to spin it to their narrative. So-called "conservative" outlets were quick to blame "antifa" for all the arson, which was only partially true...there was some of that, but there were also a bunch of crazies out doing methed up stuff. On the other side, the "liberal" outlets were in full denial that any arson was happening, instead claiming all the fires were accidental or naturally occurring. In the end, the truth was quite a bit different from what any of them reported.