Comment Re: I will when they will (Score 0) 234
That will happen, if meat becomes 10 times more expensive.
That will happen, if meat becomes 10 times more expensive.
Around 20 years ago, there was illegal software that you could install on systems running Squirrel POS (common in restaurant and bars). At the end of the day, you would tell the illegal-ware how much cash you are taking out of the register, and it would go into the (local) Squirrel database and modify it to remove enough sales to make it match up.
I can't find a link to it, but in Quebec it was rampant, and a ton of businesses got caught.
And staying in context here... that is just your understanding of it.
3000 TWh per year? It's easier to say an average of 340 GW.
Nor by an old book written by goat herders.
Multiple monitors though...
"Presently" can also mean soon, though. You will see why you should have used "currently" presently.
It's 1.46 x 10^48.
Same. The cost of the helicopter mission has to be less than the cost of launching the mass of the landing fuel. And the logistics of helicopter-catching, once the kinks are worked out, seem simpler than landing.
Catching a rocket with the tower where it's going to launch from, though -- now that is elegant.
This. I have fiber to one location, and then Ethernet to where I need it. If the house could be wired for high speed data using the phone lines in my walls, that would be great.
Here you go:
Huh. I fed the summary into the AI, and its responses were... reasonable.
Not the A-hole
NTA, but I think the real asshole is whoever created the scenario for the AI to have to judge!
Asshole
YTA. I've never read this subreddit, but I have seen the AI responses. They are not unbiased at all. "The AI can produce stunning results." Yeah it can, by being a total asshole. YTA if you use the results of their research as proof that people suck.
Toss-up
While it may be funny, the project has already attracted the attention of Redditors who disapprove of the way the AI models are "mimicking" human reasoning. There's also the question of just how helpful the project is given that it's mimicking human judgement call, which can already be found on other subreddits like r/justnomil. The team behind the project believes that their bots can help us empathize with others, but it's also worth noting that people can already do that on their own.
If you're looking to empathize, there are already plenty of ways to do so. You can read other people's opinions, you can talk to friends, you can listen to podcasts, you can watch videos, you can look at pictures, you can write in a journal, and you can meditate.
The question is, do you want to be the asshole or not?
Why are you still paying this viewpoint?
Is one thing if a production company secures a large area for a plane to crash in.
But you are not allowed to destroy your own property if you endanger other people on public (not your own) land.
Yep, Monster Cable is not allowed to sell energy drinks.
"The research project received funding from LinkedIn founder and VC Reid Hoffman, who is coincidentally a $1+ million supporter of Code.org, which provided the student data".
That's... not what "coincidentally" means. The two facts are quite related.
"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together."
