No human has ever done enough work to justify $600,000,000.
I think Salk's polio vaccine was easily worth many times this amount. Of course, he refused to patent it, so that it could get out to do the greatest good as quickly as possible.
My yearly PIA subscription went through a day or two ago and I considered cancelling the service. If they use some money to fund worthy ventures like this, I feel better about keeping my subscription active.
Linux Journal gave me my first experience programming libSDL, I was bummed out when I heard the news it was shutting down.
California receives $0.99 in federal expenditures per dollar of taxes paid, which is below the national average return for states of $1.22 per dollar paid
It's a "donor" state, but not by much.
And where did the "government agency" get the money from?
That's right, the taxpayers.
Generally, no. The business is fined a multiple of the wages illegally not paid, and the employee is paid from those.
So, the employee is paid by the employer, and the rest of the fine goes towards funding the government agency.
How exactly does one "plan on going" private in Ontario with health care when providing private health care is essentially illegal?
Private dental, mental, and prescription coverage, but you can go private for many doctors, too.
I use EQ virtual, but there are other apps that can basically do the same thing. It's illegal to see Ontario doctors for a fee, but it's perfectly fine to see doctors from any other province, and for $50 I can be seen in an hour or two. I also see clinics when I travel to the US - it's cheaper to pay the doctors to prescribe me medication there and fill it there than it is to fill it here. Plus, the clinics are willing to actually prescribe things like migraine medication and ADHD medication without simply telling me that I'll have to see a specialist, where I have to wait 3 months just to get an appointment.
Microsoft, on the other hand, DO have infinite money, and they continue to demonstrate why rewriting large, business critical software isn't just a bad idea, it's great for shareholders.
Isn't the personal service a large part of why we go out to eat and drink?
No
The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. Millenials are being saddled with giant student debt loads at the same time they are being expected to pay forward to social assistance programs that are being utilized by boomers on their slow shuffle off the planet.
The megacorps that own America can't have it both ways -- they can't pressure wages downward with the threat of outsourcing and then expect the oppressed people to cough up for expensive entertainment, whether it's movie tickets, sit down restaurants, or live sporting events. All those industries claim to be suffering but what did they expect? People, especially young people, are losing their ability to spend on trivialities.
Reimplementation also gives people the option to choose their own license. As developers, it's all too easy to succumb to "not invented here" syndrome, but there are sometimes very legitimate reasons to re-write things, even if they do exactly the same thing as existing solutions.
The absence of Microsoft from mobile device platforms is really weird.
From what I understand their current CEO is much less of a clown than Monkey Boy Ballmer was. They should be able to break into this market.
They need to stop their cycle of release > fail > abandon. Windows CE > Pocket PC > Windows Mobile > Windows Phone > Windows 10 Mobile
I don't think there will be a new browser war where Firefox or some other competitor re-captures market share from Chrome. It's like launching a new and improved horse in the year 2017. We all drive cars now.
But people still use Chrome???
He's not going to even bother competing with Chrome because he wants to take on Android?!!! Is that what he's saying?!
Any investors in Mozilla should be pulling their money ASAP
He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion