Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: to train 100 teachers (Score 1) 165

Tbh I think it's almost criminal how the PGCE currently operates. That you can teach a subject with out even a related degree just seems wrong.

I am afraid you are mistaken: to begin a PGCE you need to demonstrate suitable subject knowledge - the easiest way to do so is having a degree in a related subject. If your degree is not relevant , there exist two-year conversion courses where the first year is spent at university learning the requisite subject knowledge. If you don't have a degree you can't become a teacher in the UK.

Of course, once you are a qualified teacher you can transfer to teach other subjects at the discretion of your school - If an otherwise skilful teacher wants/needs to change to a subject where they lack the necessary knowledge it is not unknown for schools to send them on a conversion course.

I'm a comp sci student planning to go onto teach at a Secondary Level but I didn't realise how few teachers had actual comp sci backgrounds or even experience until I started doing placements in schools. Hearing a Head of ICT say he hates programming really was a shocking thing to hear.

Comp Sci graduates teaching ICT are in the minority in the UK, but there are valid reasons for that. I have a MEng in Software Engineering, and my Sixth-Formers frequently ask why I'm "wasting" my time in teaching - even they are aware that I could double my salary if I worked in industry. Of course teaching has non-financial rewards, but it's completely understandable that the vast majority of Comp Sci graduates would rather work elsewhere.

The Head of ICT you quoted almost certainly doesn't need to teach programming at the moment, so I suppose it doesn't much matter if he hates it. Be thankful that people like this exist, however; in a few year's time (once the curriculum fully changes to Computing instead of ICT), you'll be replacing them!

Comment Re:Anything but (Score 4, Insightful) 334

40Khz dynamic range

Frequency is measured in Hertz. Dynamic Range is measured in dB.

Just in case you weren't trolling: if you can notice a "loss of fidelity" in an mp3 you listen to in the car there is something wrong with your encoder. LAME -v2 (~192kbps) is almost impossible for even those with Golden Ears to ABX under ideal circumstances. In a car with 70dB of background noise you'd struggle to identify a 64kbps encode.

Comment Re:so, where's the apps? (Score 2) 374

I don't think the removal of Ethernet from the Model A is just about building down to a price.

I know that if I approached the network manager at my school and said "I want to buy 30 linux computers that pupils can use to write and execute their own code. Oh and by the way they all need network access", he'd have a blue fit!

I could see us buying a few model B's to teach the sixth-formers about networking, but for general use in my school the model A would be a much easier sell to the powers that be.

Comment 50+, Easily (Score 2) 192

I teach ICT, and don't currently have my own classroom - there are some days when I teach in 5 different computer suites.

5 classes per day means I only have to assist ten pupils per lesson and I'm up to 50 keyboards touched, and that doesn't include the keyboard of the teaching machine, my work laptop or my home PC etc.

No wonder I seem to catch every bug going round...

Comment Re:Diesel MPG (Score 1) 349

You must have a lead foot! I drive a 1.6 HDi C4, and average 720 miles (1150 km) on 13 gallon (60 L tank), mainly city driving. I don't do much motorway driving, but on the last major trip (Liverpool to Worthing and back - about 450 miles / 720 km) I used less than half a tank . The Missus tells me off for being a boy racer if I drop the average MPG below 60!

Reading car stories on Slashdot always weirds me out. I know the US gallon is smaller than the imperial gallon, but seeing numbers like "mid 40s mpg" being considered good for a diesel is just wrong. You'd have to try pretty hard in the UK to buy a car (other than an SUV) with such crappy fuel economy.

Comment Re:The list of companies to boycott (Score 2) 336

Except Intel is one company that still builds a lot of their stuff in the U.S., unlike AMD.

That's because AMD doesn't build its own stuff. They had fabs in the US, and were in the process of building a new one in NY, but were forced to sell off their fabrication after Intel's anti-competitive practices nearly bankrupted them.

Comment Re:Upgrade (Score 1) 287

Nonsense - you can hack the Wii to allow you to play games from a USB HDD (works brilliantly if you have small kids - no discs to get lost / smeared with little fingerprints). You use a utility to read the discs on the Wii and it saves image files to the HDD.

Playing the image files on an emulator would be a pretty small step from there, and no piracy required.

Comment Re:Sam I am. (Score 3, Insightful) 529

And that rock you are holding is doing a great job of keeping tigers away.

Seriously, the people who committed the 9/11 attacks are dead; they blew themselves to shit along with 3000+ innocent people. You can't "kick their asses"; their asses are scattered all over Manhattan, Virginia and Pennsylvania.

You can't maintain the pretence that getting rid of Saddam Hussein had anything to do with 9/11 - it's simply laughable. And the so-called war-on-terror in Afghanistan has only served to piss off the majority of the Afghan public, and given the Taliban more fodder for their propaganda machine.

I'll tell you what's kept the US safe from terrorist attacks like 9/11 for the last 9.5 years: An attack like that could never work again. Before 9/11 if someone tried to hijack your plane, you co-operated - The hijackers would generally want to negotiate and in the vast majority of cases everyone went home in one piece. 9/11 changed the rules. If someone tries to hijack a plane now, the passengers are going to "kick their ass" - there's nothing to lose.

Finally, you claim the US is "not willing to risk and lose [the] country just to avoid kicking their asses". If you look at the number of bad laws that have been passed as a result (e.g. the PATRIOT act), you'd see that you've already lost the country. I thought the US was supposed to be the "land of the free and the home of the brave". By implementing such draconian legislation, you've become a land of fear and oppression. The rest of the western world thinks you already let the terrorists win./p

Comment Re:Sam I am. (Score 1) 529

Sure, we should have just sat back and done nothing about being attacked, having 2 buildings knocked down, and losing approx 3K citizens and others to a direct attack on our country. Can't think of a better way to encourage another one.

It worked for Gandhi...

Slashdot Top Deals

Lots of folks confuse bad management with destiny. -- Frank Hubbard

Working...