Indeed. I've been to Glenelg many times and was once a fan of the Glenelg Football Club.

If they're looking for proof of intelligent life, they're going to the wrong place. ;-)


(Just kidding, of course. Nothing wrong with Glenelg)

The complaint at the U.S. International Trade Commission claims infringement of seven Motorola Mobility patents on features including location reminders, e-mail notification and phone/video players, Motorola Mobility said today.

Reading a 1 page article isn't really that hard...

Wow... I'm actually in the boondocks of South Australia. Population is 1,500, the nearest major city is a population of 15,000.

I can see two shiny 3G towers from my bedroom window. (Telstra and OpenNetwork (Optus/Vodafone etc))

If mobile carriers there don't think that a city with 500k population doesn't warrant a tower or two, then I'm afraid there's no hope for your telco industry.

Desqview was fucking awesome. With QEMM and Desqview, I was able to actually still use my computer while the BBS was running.

Came to put in an Atari post, glad to see someone else had already done it.

GEM on the ST was great - MultiTOS/MiNT on the Falcon 030 was even better. All during times that a PC that cost 6 times as much couldn't touch it.


This is an apt poll for me. I had a major case of nostalgia in the leadup to my birthday and just bought a Falcon 030 on eBay. I was one of the lucky ones to get one originally (apparently the first one in Oz), but stupidly got rid of it in order to finance my first x86 machine when it was obvious that the Atari platform was dead.

As someone already said, that was a default configuration. They could be upgraded to 4Mb with the integrated MMU.

3rd party upgrades that replaced the MMU were able to get 14Mb of RAM, just like the Falcon 030.

It wasn't really directed at you. It's directed at the people who think they're being wonderful people by forcing their will/intentions/beliefs on you by "praying for you" when you don't want it.

Sorry for the confusion.

Except in the case of "free will."

For the sake of argument, let's assume that there is such a thing as a soul/spirit/fluffy-bunny. If someone else prays to change any outcome for someone else's soul/spirit/fluffy-bunny without their permission or consent, no matter how good the intentions, they are infringing on that other person's free will to do whatever they want with their own soul/spirit/fluffy-bunny.

The summary references a law from 1987 that gives them the power to do so.

Without reading the history of the Act, I'd suspect that those laws were passed in 1987 to make up for the fact they were powerless to react in 1984.

I would've thought that the 'Mir" in your username would show where your loyalties lie. ;-)

Touchdown! All went well! \o/

Exactly. Regardless of whether Koh was right to disallow Samsung's attempt to use the F700 in evidence, Apple introducing it is a textbook case of "opening the door."

Otherwise Apple is making an accusation ('See? The F700 is a copy!') and Samsung isn't allowed to mention the F700 in defending themselves. It's akin to saying "John Doe fucks pigs" and then disallowing John Doe to use the word "pig" and thus defend himself by saying he'd never seen a pig before, let alone fucked one.


I can understand Apple being upset at opening the door, but that's the incompetence of their lawyer, not Samsung's fault.

It sure makes me take back all the things I thought when the Australian Government Banned Huawei from tendering for the National Broadband Network

Don't you watch South Park?

I hope you don't have any Apple products or software on your system...

You need to hang around with people who eat more insoluble fibre.