I have to say, I've been using Swiftkey for well over 13 years now.

I've found the word suggestions really good. I have not found the need to switch to a new keyboard.

What is the use case to wipe a brand new Mac and install Linux on it?

I'm not being snarky, I'm actually curious.

I would agree. With in-house software the government can at least have the assurance the software won't carry unexpected payload and spy on the agency using it as well.

VoLTE and WiFI calling may be enabled by default on the provider's side, but I don't think phones have it enabled.

It seems to be opt in, though this may vary based on multiple criteria.

If corporations weren't so willing to get dirt-cheap overseas labor, China wouldn't have consodidated so much manufacturing leverage.

Now the capability divide is so wide it's practically impossible to close it.

They don't have any more Nazi gold to hide and sell.

I mean of all the banks in the world why are we shedding a tear for these enablers?

The only winning move is not to play.

Elon Musk basically had to buy Twitter to avoid charges of lying to manipulate stock values.

He may not have gone to jail, but now Twitter isn't worth what he paid for it.

The real question is why aren't government phones locked down to begin with, with only a very specific set of approved apps installed?

The browser you use to get the browser you want.

Repealing Section 230 does not mean that suddenly every nutcase will be free to say whatever they want.

It will probably result in all comment sections being removed altogether since sites will suddenly be liable for what is posted there by others. Almost certainly this will result in fewer forums for communication since all websites will be liable for their content.

Especially in America where litigation is king.

So you'll have your free speech, and no where to voice it.

Except they are proposing just that. Perhaps asbestos doesn't have issues underwater, but there are more dangerous chemicals on an aircraft carrier than just the asbestos. In this situation, it may be the asbestos that is halting the recycling of this ship, but don't fool yourself in thinking that is the only problem with this scenario.

It sounds like there is more than just asbestos that is dangerous on the ship.

It's probably the least of the issues.

The problem with your argument is that when ships are sunk to make a reef, they are cleaned of everything but the steel. Even the paint, if I'm not mistaken. You can't just sink a ship full of thousands of gallons of motor oil and other dangerous chemicals and say it's not going to cause a problem. Eventually that ship will rust through and relase its deadly payload.

I'm not here to defend Google, but Apple's store rules are no different than Google's rules.

So why don't I read about Apple getting subjected to similar investigations and fines?

They're just as anti-competitive as Google is.