Comment Re: There are alternatives (Score 1) 654
No shit. And here I thought I was going to miss my daily reminder to feel bad for being white.
No shit. And here I thought I was going to miss my daily reminder to feel bad for being white.
Maybe this information should be shared with the Google people. There's a chance they've never considered any of these ideas.
> How do the Winklevoses cover operating expenses?
They'll make it up in volume. https://www.nbc.com/saturday-n...
The problem we've seen with AT&T is that any members of our text groups that have AT&T lines can't reply to group text messages with more than 10 people. Their phones truncate the group to 10 - so now you have another group and have to figure out who didn't get the reply. Primitive guys - up your game. That's enough to prevent me from bringing your promotion to our fire department.
Over 50 yrs is recent? https://www.nytimes.com/2001/0...
The correct Ars Technica link - https://arstechnica.com/gadget...
+1 AC, bring big group of d-bags there, especially not surprised to see which contributor over there was at the heart of this one. I was silently banned there about 10 yrs ago, I never said or did anything inflammatory, but was probably because I didn't agree with the hippy think.
I'd bet that more than 1/2 the people under the age of 30 have never had anything other than the corn syrup stuff.
easy, short-term speculation
That's what you got from this? Maps is not a single use-case for getting directions. Ok, the extra data Google has is not important to you (yet), I think slow rendering is more of an implementation problem than coming to the conclusion that the rest of that data is a detriment.
And they don't mind yanking another $50 out of their customer base to get one.
Yep. Finding a 90% correlation means the car gets very good at localizing its exact location. Plus, who's to say the Waymo cars won't someday be able to update the map?
Well, I guess since I see so many people with Beats headphones, those must be good. Is that how the line of thinking goes?
Continuously? Unless you're traveling at the same speed across the ground in the same direction, it won't be continuously. It's a wave - it moves past you.
Mine isn't - and I didn't go bottom of the line either.
"May your future be limited only by your dreams." -- Christa McAuliffe