Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment The exact chips... (Score 4, Interesting) 117

are Infineon Aurix (TriCore) chips. These are mostly 20+ year old technology for vehicles with electrical systems based on the AUTOSAR stack. The automotive industry has collectively refused to move beyond this stack despite its inability to scale effectively for the demands of modern cars. There really isn't anything these chips are doing that cannot be done with ASIL certified lockstep ARM chips, but the investment in AUTOSAR makes it a huge pain for these companies to rework their development methods and electrical architectures. They also don't have the right kind of software engineers to handle such a transition.

Comment Re: Is the touch bar a bad thing? (Score 4, Interesting) 86

They did not care about UX on the Touch Bar. There was only ever one purpose for the Touch Bar: to prove they could make an ARM based Mac. Modern Apple has always used weird features as a proving ground for future technologies. The route we took to an ARM Mac is weird, but bear with me here.

2013: Apple releases it own, in-house designed ARM64 processor, over a year before anyone else, in the iPhone 5S. This iPhone includes something Apple called a âoemotion coprocessorâ. This was used to prove capabilities for the Watch.
2015: Apple Watch is released, using a system-on-package design, incorporating all hardware into a single chip package. The system runs a feature complete fork of iOS.
2016: the T1 chip is released as the Touch Bar controller. This is a cut down 2nd generation Apple Watch SIP that replaced the SMC and enabled Touch ID.
2017: the T2 chip is released as a 2nd generation Touch Bar controller. This however is far more powerful, an iPhone 7 SoC. System tasks from macOS are offloaded to bridgeOS running on the T2, most hardware on the system is abstracted by the T2, and storage is controlled by the T2.
2020: Apple releases M1 and moves everything else over to homegrown silicon.

This company is so successful because they play the long game and take the time to conceptualize, prototype, test, and then release products profitably.

Comment Re: Why Solaris? What's the Use-Case? (Score 2) 51

There is a significant amount of financial, scientific, and engineering software that was written for the old Unixes, including Solaris, that will never be ported to Linux. It is cheaper and safer for users of this software to stay on SPARC/Solaris systems.

In 2008, I still had a Sun Ultra 1 C3D and SGI Iris Indigo on my desk at work in an engineering company because we had to support our customers on those platforms.

Slashdot Top Deals

The Tao is like a glob pattern: used but never used up. It is like the extern void: filled with infinite possibilities.

Working...