Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:You don't understand (Score 1) 205

Take off your rose colored glasses for minute. First of all, no-reply emails are a means to notify a customer of something. They are one-way.

I am writing to "notify" you that any business using with this attitude is run by shitty people and deserves to fail. You don't get to dictate what I'm "meant" to do!

Please direct all responses to no-reply@gofuckyourself.com

Comment Re:And one other thing... (Score 1) 205

Sometimes when I have a choice of companies to buy a product from, Ill send an email or fill out the web form asking the same question to multiple companies.

And that's the other asinine thing about bullshit web forms: they force you to send the message to one recipient at a time. As a slightly different example, say I want to write my Congressmen about something. Instead of just writing an email and putting three names in the To: field, now I have to answer a slightly disjoint set of (potentially) invasive questions three times over. It's not that it's hard or even that time-consuming; it's that it's galling because I shouldn't have to jump through hoops like that.

Comment Re:You're nobody. (Score 1) 205

Think about it - if you were running a very large company, would you rather: a) have a catch-all email that runs the gamut of issues, feedback, etc. b) have a way to submit categorized feedback via web forms?

If I were running a very large company, I would want everyone to be forced to just give me their money instead of having to go through the trouble of actually selling something to them in return.

But I wouldn't be entitled to that -- just like how companies are not entitled to be able to dictate communications terms to their customers, either!

Comment Re:What *can* FCC do? (Score 1) 173

A person's civil rights should not change just because they are on one side of an imaginary line or the other. State's right are a vestige of a bygone age, when we couldn't travel across the country in a matter of hours. They have no place in our modern political system..

The conclusion does not follow from the premise. It's true that no government (regardless of level) should have the power to infringe on the rights of the People. But, of the powers that government can have, it is not necessarily true that the Federal government must have all of them instead of only a subset.

In fact, this is exactly what the Tenth Amendment of the US Constitution affirms: that all valid governmental powers (and by "valid" I mean powers which do not infringe on human rights) which are not specifically delegated to the Federal government are instead reserved for State or local governments. In other words (to make a technology analogy to firewalls or ACLs), the Federal government is supposed to operate on a default-deny policy: the Federal government is prohibited from exercising any authority except for the powers explicitly whitelisted in Article 1, Section 8.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra

Working...