...something is to be said for unenlightened self-interest. I am just not sure as to what.
Given that the 7th and 9th Circuits have OK'd warrantless tracking, I am unsure how quickly the Supreme Court would grant cert on this issue. And given the current members of the Court, I might not like their decision.
Since when do the Jews control the entire recording industry? Certainly there are Jewish people at some of the major labels, but attributing ALL of the accounting issues to the Jews? I smell a troll.....
Just to clarify something for you, all property rights are "imaginary" rights. Whether the property right is over a tangible or intangible object is not relevant.
Still fighting the American Civil War in 2010.
...I find the iPad to be a perfect web surfing device. Great for e-mail and watching video. I am actually considering selling my Macbook Pro, as it is starting to get dusty. That said, I wouldn't want to write a novel on it.
The only claim I see the Feds have for antitrust is for Apple "tying" disparate products, hardware and apps, similar to the issue in U.S. v. Microsoft (o.s. and browser). However, given Apple has only about 25% of the market share in the smart phone arena, I do not see the basis for the Feds action. The development platform only lock for Apple products strikes me as failing to meet the antitrust standard.
... Let the market decide? If people value walled gardens over open source or vice versatile, then let users vote with their dollars ornEuros or whatever?
Beware of Programmers who carry screwdrivers. -- Leonard Brandwein
