Comment Re:Car wraps (Score 1) 229
Yep, it's there for everyone to read. You're just too stupid to realize that you're the one who looks like an idiot.
You're such a fucking joke. Enjoy your ignorance.
Yep, it's there for everyone to read. You're just too stupid to realize that you're the one who looks like an idiot.
You're such a fucking joke. Enjoy your ignorance.
You go to college to get an education. You go to a trade school to learn a trade. If you go to college to learn a trade, either you or the college has made a serious mistake.
What is your suggestion?
We used to put effort into training new hires, helping them learn the business and our way of doing things. We didn't expect a kid fresh out of college to be productive on day one. We understood the value of institutional knowledge and knew that even a modest six-month investment in a new hire would more than pay for itself down the road.
The "educated" people coming out of even the best universities
The best minds in any field are the ones who can draw from a wider perspective. I don't want or need someone limited to just their experience working through [worthless industry cert]. I don't care if you can confidently setup [latest industry fad] in a common configuration if you get frightened and confused when you see a little math.
I'll never understand this resistance to education. It's like watching a bunch of blind men insist that sight is overrated.
If you think government is the problem, I'll make you the same offer I make all of you libertarian morons: A one-way ticket to Somolia. Live your best life free from government interference!
Get a fucking clue.
Tell me again how a trillion dollars worth of college bailout, is just a figment of my imagination
It's a very obviously a figment of your imagination.
along with the reason for it.
It's a figment of your imagination because no such thing happened.
Stay in school, kids. Don't be like geekmux.
[*]is that the right one?
Yes.
What a stupid thing to say. You should have stayed in school.
If you think things are bad for the kids who went to college, you should see how bad things are for kids with just a high school diploma.
College more than pays for itself. That's an indisputable fact.
A typical electrician who dropped out of high school can do more than an Electrical Engineering grad that first week.
After that first week, you realize why you hire educated people and not high school dropouts.
Here in reality, we recognize that it is extremely difficult to accumulate that much wealth by honest means.
Millionaire status is well-within reach, given careful planning early in your career. To be a billionaire, however, requires legacy, larceny, or a mix of both. If you're a billionaire, odds are good that you're a giant piece of shit that has screwed over too many people to count.
AI is a marketing term, that's undeniable. I'm not sure why you think 3D and 32-bit fall into the same category, but that hardly matters.
The real trouble is that what AI means to researchers and what AI means to the public are two very different things.
The term itself was coined by John McCarthy for the Dartmouth conference in 1956, though he has said he can't be sure if that no one used it before. We know that there was some controversy over the the term at that time, for obvious reasons, but it's way too late to complain about it now.
The science fiction version of the term, robots with feelings or whatever, came later. The field itself was never about that. The Dartmouth conference proposal comes the closest, defining the term this way: "For the present purpose the artificial intelligence problem is taken to be that of making a machine behave in ways that would be called intelligent if a human were so behaving.". Pamela McCorduck's provocatively titled Machines Who Think has the single best account of the state of things leading up to the conference, the conference itself, and what came out it if you're interested.
The field of AI is surprisingly broad and covers are a lot of things that you would, I suspect, viscerally reject as being AI. Linear regression, for example. What it doesn't cover is silly science fiction nonsense. Anyone claiming to be an AI researcher working on 'the hard problem' or some related thing is an obvious crackpot who should be ridiculed and then ignored.
The current AI hype is driven largely by companies, like the above, deliberately trying to confuse reality with science fiction. In my opinion, it often crosses the line into outright fraud.
Really? You're going to double-down after I've made it clear that you look like an idiot? Whatever. It's not your reputation could get any worse.
Let's see if I can explain this in a way even you can understand:
Attempt #1: You need to be able see outside of the car to drive, which is why cars have windows. A Faraday cage would obstruct the windows in an unsafe way. (You generally want holes no bigger than about 1/10th of the wavelength.)
In my first post, I said that a wrap wouldn't work. This is why. Only a drooling moron would think that my "right idea" comment meant we put the car in a larger cage!
Attempt #2: You don't need a Faraday cage that covers the whole car. You only need one around the part that is transmitting. This isn't always easy. (To disable On-Star, for example, it is recommended that you completely disconnect the module.) The only way to be sure that your shielding is adequate is to use a tool like a spectrum analyzer. Such a thing is well-beyond your ability, of course, but trivial for anyone of ordinary intelligence.
I'd add a third thing, but you're not worth the effort I've put in already.
OMG... You have got to be the dumbest person on this site
You're really embarrassing yourself here.
If you can't receive a signal in the car, then you're good.
Your ability to "receive a signal" on your phone tells you nothing about the ability of your car to "receive a signal", you drooling moron.
Wait... are you still thinking about wrapping your car in a Faraday cage? I dismissed the idea in my first post without explaining why that wouldn't work because
it's blindingly obvious. Well, obvious to anyone with an IQ above room temperature.
Wow, you really are that stupid. That's impressive.
Your phone won't tell you anything about a signal being emitted by your car.
I'm talking about the performance implications of poor memory management, not the amount of memory needed.
As for "demands things be done quickly and cheaply", I explain in my post that developers waste considerable time and effort in foolishly trying save time and effort with countless third-party libraries. That could be a manager problem in some cases, but odds are good that its a developer problem.
How, exactly, would you achieve such a feat?
This should be good for a laugh.
Only through hard work and perseverance can one truly suffer.