Comment Re:Hemos Says: "So Long, and Thanks For All The Fi (Score 1) 1521
Hah, I thought the registration thing was silly for a while as well, though clearly a little longer than you.
Hah, I thought the registration thing was silly for a while as well, though clearly a little longer than you.
BTW, keep in mind that 802.11n is not synonymous with 5 GHz support. Some devices list 802.11n, but still only work on 2.4 GHz.
For the devices that support it (decent laptops, iPad, and possibly other tablets), going to the 5 GHz band is a huge win. There are plenty of non-overlapping channels, and congestion is lower. The problem is that most WiFi enabled phones only support the 2.4 GHz band, so this will not cover all cases.
Yes, I am aware of what is for sale, since we buy these things for our lab. (Although our sources are low enough in intensity to avoid the tracking required for the big boys.) I am confused by the use of the term "reactor" which is typically used to describe a device that is designed to produce fission reactions (or fusion, if you are a Farnsworth kind of person).
Generating fission is different than having a bunch of things that undergo radioactive decay. You need some neutrons, and a fissile material. It sounds like the (alpha, n) reaction on beryllium is a reasonable guess for neutron production, and you can use the neutrons to induce fission on uranium, even if it won't be remotely self-sustaining.
I'm puzzled how this guy was going to build a "nuclear reactor" out of mail-order isotopes and smoke detectors. Smoke detectors usually contain Am-241, which is an alpha emitter. The mail order stuff I assume was uranium ore. Was he planning to create neutrons from (alpha, n) reactions and use those to trigger a few fissions from the uranium?
This sounds like his experiment bears as much similarity to a reactor as a balloon full of hairspray resembles a car engine.
Internet Selection Effect. (AKA "self selection bias + online discussions") The comment distribution is generally shifted toward angry rants about the topic. It turns out that anger plus a sense of "rightness" provides good emotional fuel to convince someone to click the "Reply" button.
Sure, being able to rent a computer for $1.68 an hour to do this cracking is a huge win. I was taking issue with the implication from the summary that this has been beyond individuals up until now, or that Tesla cards are some kind of magical supercomputer thing. We've had the power for a while, and high end GeForce cards can hold their own with Tesla on everything but double precision.
In fact, looking at the specs of the midrange NVIDIA GPU in my laptop, it could probably do this calculation in a few hours. Not as impressive as 6 minutes, but one should wary of breathless enthusiasm here.
Southwest has their quirks (poor boarding procedures for people with kids, some people really don't like open seating, etc), but they continue to allow each passenger two checked bags for free. They also don't charge explicit fees for ticket changes, though you have to pay the difference in seat prices if they have gone up. So far, they seem to be doing OK, so at least one airline hasn't had to go super-crazy with the unbundling to stay profitable. (Instead they just made their frequent flier awards much harder to use than 5 years ago.)
I think the only "extra charge" option is their Early Bird checkin, which basically gets you on the plane first for $10.
On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN.