agreed. but at least we can look back upon the good old days, where they actually made at least a half-assed effort to pretend it wasn't so

it also depends on what your definition of 'is' is.

i absolutely disagree. america is also a kleptocracy.

reminds me of that south park episode.. "Thank you ladies and gentlemen. If there are any questions, you may direct them to that brick wall over there."

don't like something on tv? now there's an app for that... initiate 4 billion complaints in under 10 seconds! just what the government 'surveys' of what the 'people want' ordered

rule 34 of the ancient world.. if you can think it.. there's a hieroglyph of it

representations of deities as men with animal parts are deliberate attempts to communicate messages in a language/medium which a normal person can receive - albeit perhaps at a level initially somewhat unconscious. a modest exploration of of myth and symbology should make this clear.

unless someone on the case is a cop.. in which case the DA won't give you enough evidence to indict.

lord ganesha proof of plastic surgery?? rarely do i found abject ignorance so funny. but this is gold!!

as eckhart tolle once said when asked about whether the world is getting better/awakening or spiraling down into darkness... the answer is 'both'. so on the one hand, while the descent is very real and significant, it seems that a growing number (massive number i think in fact) are (being shocked sometimes into) waking up to the truer nature of things, and real-eyes-ing that there is far more going on than what see-an-end (cnn) talks about. love is coming.

but for it to find us, we need to take responsibility for the condition of our hearts.

politicians throughout history have rarely been 'in charge'. remember when christian bale thought raz-al-gool was the asian guy instead of liam neeson? yeah. like that.

at the risk of recommending a 'banned book', checkout 'zinn's people's history of the united states.'

i agree with pretty much everything you said, except for your implicit acknowledgement that the 'terrorists' are who and what MSM say they are.

i think the original poster simply erred by referencing chemical and opposed to nuclear weapons. in any case, why anyone would believe anything lying liars say is beyond me.

just because a film might be on youtube (is the greater good even there? i dont know), doesn't make it a 'youtube video put together by someone in their basement.' go to http://www.greatergoodmovie.or... if you want, and see what was put into it and making it.

frankly, i don't care where the truth comes from. it could be scribbled on the back of a napkin.



the only thing more painful than having to listen to propaganda, is having to listen to it regurgitated by it's victims.

dude. tldr. i thought these piece-by-piece rebuttals were one-off, but they seem to be youre mo. uncle. you're right about everything.