Asking ChatGPT how to do something as a test, or asking it how to do something as an actual request tends to give different results, because the second tends to force people to ask the question in a sufficiently appropriate manner, where as those "testing" (trying to challenge ChatGPT) tend to provide insufficient context.

Some people are stupid.

The union will use anything close to a "likeness", so they'll find an "actor" to match a voice.

The implication is the people who are 90+ are healthier because of their time, lack of plastic, etc.

It's a bold, incorrect assumption in many respects.

Just pointing out an obvious one. Survivor bias is a thing.

Those 90+ year olds were exposed to more radiation in their lifetimes, at an early age, than you're ever likely to see; short of a nuclear war.

Research gets published because "publish or perish" is a thing.

Any benefit is secondary.

It isn't in and of itself. The connotations that it brings forward however may be.

There are many things that are currently considered racist that are only racist because someone then used it as an insult and it propagated as such.

"Chief" predates the "discovery" of North America, yet now that term is considered racist by some unless it's specifically and only used to refer to the leader of an indigenous group in North America.

You should see the studies on primates related to this. They absolutely blow away humans on their ability to see a set of objects and duplicate the number and positions in a fraction of a second.

There's always classified patents around jet engines, specifically because they are used in missles. This won't see the light of day for decades.

You think I put that there? The damn AI is trying to offset my statement by making me look stupid. Nobody else fell for it though.

This.

Had he started off showing he couldn't register the patents because of the use of AI it would be a totally different discussion.

Because he doesn't give a shit about the parents themselves, he just wanted to be the first to register patents for an AI.

He'd probably then patent the process of registering the AI patents...

That line wasn't put in the article by the editor, you're device inserted it itself.

Should any university student be found to have used a book without legally
Purchasing or borrowing from the library any credits, certifications, diplomas or degrees given should be withdrawn and the student should be hence required to be barred from the industry in which they utilize said skills.

If they knew how the average article was written they'd probably appreciate the AI ones more.