Talk about deceptive titles. The Daily Mail gets it wrong; read the other scientist's own blog here http://judithcurry.com/2011/10/30/discussion-with-rich-muller/ and here http://judithcurry.com/2011/10/30/mail-on-best
Or if that's too much information for you, here's the money quote: "I have to say that there isn’t much that we disagree on."
You're the first poster in this discussion to bring up the holocaust.
For you, perhaps; for those of us who like having a decent mp3 player, it's a reason to use ALAC.
Awesome update; everything is running much snappier! And I haven't even installed it yet!!
Great job Apple!
you're holding them wrong
it depends how you hold it?
no Apple enthusiast will be swept off his/her feet
true but some of us who managed to hold off on purchasing the iPad 1 might finally take the plunge
+1, best resurrection of an annoying 10-year old troll... What's the health status of *BSD these days?
What's a XOOM?
I have a little experience with CalTrans with this type of compliant. It is all about who is filling the "Official" request for change that gets added to the log of shit for the DOT to get money to fix. Before the DOT can have the guys in trucks show up to do anything, they have to have approval so they can pay for materials and labor and the head engineer's office that has to take responsibility for the repair. It seems overkill but it is the only to manage a project backlog of 100,000 items.
In my case I saw that a protected turn light and a pedestrian walk signal would give cars the right of way to run over anyone in the crosswalk that was crossing when indicated. I went to the DOT office and filed a compliant, but since I did not work for the city's or county's public works office, I didn't have the authority to file an official complaint. So I went to the city's public works office and they went and looked at it and saw that it did not meet code and filed a compliant on behalf of the city. The guy in the article probably skipped this step therefore making the DOT guy look like an Asshat.
revolving around slowly in a circle going "pew pew pew!" at it
The ultimate in security through obscurity!
They were using an early version of Apple's Time Machine application.
At this rate, there will be naked chicks in The Economist by 2014!
And running a software company is not the same as slinging dope.
True. You have to pay for your first hit of Windows.
We are each entitled to our own opinion, but no one is entitled to his own facts. -- Patrick Moynihan
