Reminds me strangely of BeOS.

Everything old is new again.

Nuclear reactors are inherently unsafe. There is no fool proof method to ensure cooling.

Which is why it is not possible to actually insure them. So they are subsidised.

Which is why nuclear energy is artificially cheap.

There are so many other inherently safe methods of producing power, that nuclear is ridiculous. Get over it already.

It's not the that the subsidy is too low, it's that the subsidy for carbon based energy production is way too high.

You're new round here, aren't you?

I think you are pretty close. /. recycles its moderators. Very quickly. This is probably not quite doable for wikipedia.

I suggest that there is some limit on the length of time one can be an admin. Increase the size of the pool (still have screening), but decrease the time you can admin. There are lots of ways. Some sort of cycle - 6 months on, 6 months off - that sort of thing...

YHBT. YHL. HAND.

Gee Ted, in your awful future, I would've be paying PER WORD.

Fuck you. You lost. Move on.

There is some truth to what you say, but I don't think this is publicity that the hive will mind.

They have been "hackers on steroids" for a long time now, and this just furthers their reputation as people not to mess with.

I doubt that anyone will do time for this - it's just simply to easy to be anon these days. The only members of the hive who have been caught are LOICers not proxying.

Regardless of all of that, this is still massive HBGary fail.

The emails are the gift that keeps giving, see wikileaks angle today.

Lets just score this:

Anonymous: No damage. No arrests, no lawsuits, no exposure of anyone that wasn't already in the open.

HBGary: Emails stolen. Websited pwnd. Crap security protocols exposed. Significant reputational damage. Corporate imaged tarnished (looking like fools will do that to you).

Summary: There IS such a thing as bad publicity.

Final Score:
Anonymous 5, HBGary, 0.

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=19548&cid=1878668

I wonder if this still works. Haven't tried it in decades.

Caldera or the real Santa Cruz?

SCO Group is not SCO, it is Caldera.

BRING BACK SIGNAL11

So, you resort to weak hypotheticals.

Just answer the question.

The US was right to kill the reuters journalists, and refuse to release the video?

And this makes Assange a bad guy?

So.... what you are saying is that the US was right to kill those Reuters journalists and refuse to release the video? And that Assange is the bad guy here. Cos, he ... errrr.... ummm... Sorry, I don't get it. Explain it again to me?